From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, lkp@01.org
Subject: Re: [vfs] 8bb3c61baf: vm-scalability.median -23.7% regression
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2019 22:46:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190908214601.GC1131@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190903084122.GH15734@shao2-debian>
On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 04:41:22PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Greeting,
>
> FYI, we noticed a -23.7% regression of vm-scalability.median due to commit:
>
>
> commit: 8bb3c61bafa8c1cd222ada602bb94ff23119e738 ("vfs: Convert ramfs, shmem, tmpfs, devtmpfs, rootfs to use the new mount API")
> https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git work.mount
>
> in testcase: vm-scalability
> on test machine: 88 threads Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v4 @ 2.20GHz with 128G memory
> with following parameters:
>
> runtime: 300s
> size: 16G
> test: shm-pread-rand
> cpufreq_governor: performance
> ucode: 0xb000036
That thing loses size=... option. Both size= and nr_blocks= affect the
same thing (->max_blocks), but the parser keeps track of the options
it has seen and applying the parsed data to superblock checks only
whether nr_blocks= had been there. IOW, size= gets parsed, but the
result goes nowhere.
I'm not sure whether it's better to fix the patch up or redo it from
scratch - it needs to be carved up anyway and it's highly non-transparent,
so I'm probably going to replace the damn thing entirely with something
that would be easier to follow.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-08 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-03 8:41 [vfs] 8bb3c61baf: vm-scalability.median -23.7% regression kernel test robot
2019-09-08 21:46 ` Al Viro [this message]
2019-09-08 23:47 ` Al Viro
2019-09-09 3:10 ` Hugh Dickins
2019-09-09 3:56 ` Al Viro
2019-09-10 6:27 ` Hugh Dickins
2019-09-11 3:05 ` Hugh Dickins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190908214601.GC1131@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@01.org \
--cc=rong.a.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox