From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=hqT0=XE=vger.kernel.org=linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD07DC00307
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Mon,  9 Sep 2019 09:55:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8EBF2086D
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Mon,  9 Sep 2019 09:55:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S2390042AbfIIJzJ (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 9 Sep 2019 05:55:09 -0400
Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:48186 "EHLO mga02.intel.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1728995AbfIIJzI (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 9 Sep 2019 05:55:08 -0400
X-Amp-Result: UNSCANNABLE
X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False
Received: from fmsmga008.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.58])
  by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Sep 2019 02:55:08 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,484,1559545200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="183770708"
Received: from smile.fi.intel.com (HELO smile) ([10.237.68.40])
  by fmsmga008.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Sep 2019 02:55:06 -0700
Received: from andy by smile with local (Exim 4.92.1)
        (envelope-from <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>)
        id 1i7GO1-0006Jf-Bp; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 12:55:05 +0300
Date:   Mon, 9 Sep 2019 12:55:05 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/13] software node: get rid of property_set_pointer()
Message-ID: <20190909095505.GQ2680@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20190909081557.93766-1-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
 <20190909081557.93766-4-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190909081557.93766-4-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 01:15:47AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Instead of explicitly setting values of integer types when copying property
> entries lets just copy entire value union when processing non-array values.
> 
> When handling array values assign the pointer there using the newly introduced
> "raw" pointer union member. This allows us to remove property_set_pointer().

Is this reincarnation of 318a19718261?
Have you read 63dcc7090137?

>From me NAK.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko