From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: hpa@zytor.com
Cc: Brendan Shanks <bshanks@codeweavers.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
x86@kernel.org, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/umip: Add emulation for 64-bit processes
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 08:28:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190910062828.GA40888@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7BFFC7D1-6158-4237-AEF9-D10635F054FC@zytor.com>
* hpa@zytor.com <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> I would strongly suggest that we change the term "emulation" to
> "spoofing" for these instructions. We need to explain that we do *not*
> execute these instructions the was the CPU would have, and unlike the
> native instructions do not leak kernel information.
Ok, I've edited the patch to add the 'spoofing' wording where
appropriate, and I also made minor fixes such as consistently
capitalizing instruction names.
Can I also add your Reviewed-by tag?
So the patch should show up in tip:x86/asm today-ish, and barring any
complications is v5.4 material.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-10 6:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-05 23:22 [PATCH] x86/umip: Add emulation for 64-bit processes Brendan Shanks
2019-09-07 21:26 ` Ricardo Neri
2019-09-08 7:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-09-09 11:56 ` hpa
2019-09-09 22:34 ` Brendan Shanks
2019-09-09 12:04 ` hpa
2019-09-10 6:28 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2019-09-10 6:32 ` hpa
2019-09-10 6:37 ` [PATCH v2] " Ingo Molnar
2019-09-10 6:41 ` [tip: x86/asm] x86/umip: Add emulation (spoofing) for UMIP covered instructions in 64-bit processes as well tip-bot2 for Brendan Shanks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190910062828.GA40888@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bshanks@codeweavers.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox