From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A967C49ED6 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:37:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBDC62087E for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:37:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727470AbfIKKhb (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 06:37:31 -0400 Received: from 8bytes.org ([81.169.241.247]:54048 "EHLO theia.8bytes.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725616AbfIKKha (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 06:37:30 -0400 Received: by theia.8bytes.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0E3E9386; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 12:37:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 12:37:27 +0200 From: "joro@8bytes.org" To: "Mehta, Sohil" Cc: "Park, Kyung Min" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Raj, Ashok" , "Lu, Baolu" , "Shevchenko, Andriy" , "dwmw2@infradead.org" , "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Add Scalable Mode fault information Message-ID: <20190911103726.GB21988@8bytes.org> References: <1567793642-17063-1-git-send-email-kyung.min.park@intel.com> <20190910080823.GA3247@8bytes.org> <1568136807.58430.11.camel@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1568136807.58430.11.camel@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 05:30:09PM +0000, Mehta, Sohil wrote: > On Tue, 2019-09-10 at 10:08 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > > +     "Unknown", "Unknown", "Unknown", "Unknown", "Unknown", > > "Unknown", "Unknown", /* 0x49-0x4F */ > > > > Maybe add the number (0x49-0x4f) to the respecting "Unknown" fields? > > If > > we can't give a reason we should give the number for easier debugging > > in > > the future. Same for the "Unknown" fields below. > > I believe a fault number is always printed in dmar_fault_do_one() even > if the reason is unknown. > > DMAR: [DMA Write] Request device [00:02.0] fault addr 108a000 [fault > reason 23] Unknown Right, applied the patch, thanks.