From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Ayan Halder <Ayan.Halder@arm.com>
Cc: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>,
Brian Starkey <Brian.Starkey@arm.com>,
"maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com"
<maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"maxime.ripard@bootlin.com" <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>,
"sean@poorly.run" <sean@poorly.run>,
"airlied@linux.ie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
"daniel@ffwll.ch" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] drm:- Add a modifier to denote 'protected' framebuffer
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 14:53:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190917125301.GQ3958@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190909134241.23297-1-ayan.halder@arm.com>
On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 01:42:53PM +0000, Ayan Halder wrote:
> Add a modifier 'DRM_FORMAT_MOD_ARM_PROTECTED' which denotes that the framebuffer
> is allocated in a protected system memory.
> Essentially, we want to support EGL_EXT_protected_content in our komeda driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ayan Kumar Halder <ayan.halder@arm.com>
>
> /-- Note to reviewer
> Komeda driver is capable of rendering DRM (Digital Rights Management) protected
> content. The DRM content is stored in a framebuffer allocated in system memory
> (which needs some special hardware signals for access).
>
> Let us ignore how the protected system memory is allocated and for the scope of
> this discussion, we want to figure out the best way possible for the userspace
> to communicate to the drm driver to turn the protected mode on (for accessing the
> framebuffer with the DRM content) or off.
>
> The possible ways by which the userspace could achieve this is via:-
>
> 1. Modifiers :- This looks to me the best way by which the userspace can
> communicate to the kernel to turn the protected mode on for the komeda driver
> as it is going to access one of the protected framebuffers. The only problem is
> that the current modifiers describe the tiling/compression format. However, it
> does not hurt to extend the meaning of modifiers to denote other attributes of
> the framebuffer as well.
>
> The other reason is that on Android, we get an info from Gralloc
> (GRALLOC_USAGE_PROTECTED) which tells us that the buffer is protected. This can
> be used to set up the modifier/s (AddFB2) during framebuffer creation.
How does this mesh with other modifiers, like AFBC? That's where I see the
issue here.
>
> 2. Framebuffer flags :- As of today, this can be one of the two values
> ie (DRM_MODE_FB_INTERLACED/DRM_MODE_FB_MODIFIERS). Unlike modifiers, the drm
> framebuffer flags are generic to the drm subsystem and ideally we should not
> introduce any driver specific constraint/feature.
>
> 3. Connector property:- I could see the following properties used for DRM
> protected content:-
> DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_DESIRED / ENABLED :- "This property is used by
> userspace to request the kernel protect future content communicated over
> the link". Clearly, we are not concerned with the protection attributes of the
> transmitter. So, we cannot use this property for our case.
>
> 4. DRM plane property:- Again, we want to communicate that the framebuffer(which
> can be attached to any plane) is protected. So introducing a new plane property
> does not help.
>
> 5. DRM crtc property:- For the same reason as above, introducing a new crtc
> property does not help.
6. Just track this as part of buffer allocation, i.e. I think it does
matter how you allocate these protected buffers. We could add a "is
protected buffer" flag at the dma_buf level for this.
So yeah for this stuff here I think we do want the full userspace side,
from allocator to rendering something into this protected buffers (no need
to also have the entire "decode a protected bitstream part" imo, since
that will freak people out). Unfortunately, in my experience, that kills
it for upstream :-/ But also in my experience of looking into this for
other gpu's, we really need to have the full picture here to make sure
we're not screwing this up.
-Daniel
>
> --/
>
> ---
> include/uapi/drm/drm_fourcc.h | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/drm_fourcc.h b/include/uapi/drm/drm_fourcc.h
> index 3feeaa3f987a..38e5e81d11fe 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/drm/drm_fourcc.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/drm_fourcc.h
> @@ -742,6 +742,15 @@ extern "C" {
> */
> #define AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BCH (1ULL << 11)
>
> +/*
> + * Protected framebuffer
> + *
> + * The framebuffer is allocated in a protected system memory which can be accessed
> + * via some special hardware signals from the dpu. This is used to support
> + * 'GRALLOC_USAGE_PROTECTED' in our framebuffer for EGL_EXT_protected_content.
> + */
> +#define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_ARM_PROTECTED fourcc_mod_code(ARM, (1ULL << 55))
> +
> /*
> * Allwinner tiled modifier
> *
> --
> 2.23.0
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-17 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-09 13:42 [RFC PATCH] drm:- Add a modifier to denote 'protected' framebuffer Ayan Halder
2019-09-17 12:53 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2019-09-17 16:07 ` Liviu Dudau
2019-09-17 16:15 ` Neil Armstrong
2019-09-17 17:36 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-09-30 9:51 ` Brian Starkey
2019-09-30 12:57 ` Ayan Halder
2019-10-01 15:30 ` Alex Deucher
2019-09-18 8:49 ` Daniel Stone
2019-09-18 12:04 ` Liviu Dudau
2019-09-18 21:30 ` Daniel Stone
2019-09-19 14:03 ` Ayan Halder
2019-09-19 14:10 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-09-19 15:13 ` Ayan Halder
2019-09-20 14:05 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-09-19 15:52 ` Alex Deucher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190917125301.GQ3958@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=Ayan.Halder@arm.com \
--cc=Brian.Starkey@arm.com \
--cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=maxime.ripard@bootlin.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=sean@poorly.run \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox