Re: [PATCH v7 09/13] lib/vsprintf: Add a note on re-using %pf or %pF

Steven Rostedt
2019-09-18T14:00:26Z

On Wed, 18 Sep 2019 16:34:15 +0300
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> Add a note warning of re-use of obsolete %pf or %pF extensions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>

> ---
> lib/vsprintf.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
> index b00b57f9f911f..df59818537b52 100644
> --- a/lib/vsprintf.c
> +++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
> @@ -2008,6 +2008,8 @@ static char *kobject_string(char *buf, char *end, void *ptr,
> * - 'S' For symbolic direct pointers (or function descriptors) with offset
> * - 's' For symbolic direct pointers (or function descriptors) without offset
> * - '[Ss]R' as above with __builtin_extract_return_addr() translation
> + * - '[Ff]' Obsolete an now unsupported extension for printing direct pointers

"Obsolete and now"?

-- Steve

> + * or function descriptors. Be careful when re-using %pf or %pF!
> * - 'B' For backtraced symbolic direct pointers with offset
> * - 'R' For decoded struct resource, e.g., [mem 0x0-0x1f 64bit pref]
> * - 'r' For raw struct resource, e.g., [mem 0x0-0x1f flags 0x201]