From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AD78C3A5A6 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 21:56:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B9D208C0 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 21:56:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2404923AbfISV4b (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Sep 2019 17:56:31 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:44443 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389212AbfISV4b (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Sep 2019 17:56:31 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 4C0CB68B20; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 23:56:26 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 23:56:25 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: kernel test robot Cc: Christoph Hellwig , "Darrick J. Wong" , LKML , lkp@01.org Subject: Re: [xfs] 27d1053021: xfstests.xfs.173.fail Message-ID: <20190919215625.GA13358@lst.de> References: <20190919014602.GN15734@shao2-debian> <20190919174705.GA9622@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190919174705.GA9622@lst.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 07:47:05PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 09:46:02AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > > FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-7): > > > > commit: 27d10530217ee6d6a0388014fd773820ee354ce5 ("xfs: remove the unused XFS_ALLOC_USERDATA flag") > > Well, this does not make a whole lot of sense, given that the patch > literally just removes an unused flag. that being said that test has > been father flakey for me for a long time. But the weird part is that it actually reproduces here with 1k block size file system despite make no sense at all..