From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@elte.hu, acme@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf record: fix priv level with branch sampling for paranoid=2
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 21:12:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190920191223.GC26850@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190904062603.90165-1-eranian@google.com>
On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 11:26:03PM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Now that the default perf_events paranoid level is set to 2, a regular user
> cannot monitor kernel level activity anymore. As such, with the following
> cmdline:
>
> $ perf record -e cycles date
>
> The perf tool first tries cycles:uk but then falls back to cycles:u
> as can be seen in the perf report --header-only output:
>
> cmdline : /export/hda3/tmp/perf.tip record -e cycles ls
> event : name = cycles:u, , id = { 436186, ... }
>
> This is okay as long as there is way to learn the priv level was changed
> internally by the tool.
>
> But consider a similar example:
>
> $ perf record -b -e cycles date
> Error:
> You may not have permission to collect stats.
>
> Consider tweaking /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_paranoid,
> which controls use of the performance events system by
> unprivileged users (without CAP_SYS_ADMIN).
> ...
>
> Why is that treated differently given that the branch sampling inherits the
> priv level of the first event in this case, i.e., cycles:u? It turns out
> that the branch sampling code is more picky and also checks exclude_hv.
>
> In the fallback path, perf record is setting exclude_kernel = 1, but it
> does not change exclude_hv. This does not seem to match the restriction
> imposed by paranoid = 2.
>
> This patch fixes the problem by forcing exclude_hv = 1 in the fallback
> for paranoid=2. With this in place:
>
> $ perf record -b -e cycles date
> cmdline : /export/hda3/tmp/perf.tip record -b -e cycles ls
> event : name = cycles:u, , id = { 436847, ... }
>
> And the command succeeds as expected.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> index 85825384f9e8..3cbe06fdf7f7 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> @@ -2811,9 +2811,11 @@ bool perf_evsel__fallback(struct evsel *evsel, int err,
> if (evsel->name)
> free(evsel->name);
> evsel->name = new_name;
> - scnprintf(msg, msgsize,
> -"kernel.perf_event_paranoid=%d, trying to fall back to excluding kernel samples", paranoid);
> + scnprintf(msg, msgsize, "kernel.perf_event_paranoid=%d, trying "
> + "to fall back to excluding kernel and hypervisor "
> + " samples", paranoid);
extra space in here ^
Warning:
kernel.perf_event_paranoid=2, trying to fall back to excluding kernel and hypervisor samples
other than that it looks good to me
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
thanks,
jirka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-20 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-04 6:26 [PATCH] perf record: fix priv level with branch sampling for paranoid=2 Stephane Eranian
2019-09-13 8:14 ` Stephane Eranian
2019-09-20 19:12 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2019-09-20 23:05 ` Stephane Eranian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190920191223.GC26850@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox