public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@stackframe.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: allow larger than require DMA masks
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 23:25:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190924212554.GA31357@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1569286782.3657.29.camel@HansenPartnership.com>

On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 08:59:42PM -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> > 	if (mask > ~0U)
> > »     »       return 0;
> > 
> > Removing the if() makes the DMA mapping work. It's almost midnight
> > here, so i won't look into that any further today. Does anyone have
> > an opinion on this behaviour? Otherwise i will look a bit more into
> > this in the next days.
> 
> The reason for the if was to kick the device into 32 bit descriptors,
> which are usually more efficient, especially with older dual descriptor
> format cards like we have on parisc systems.

These days we use the dma_get_required_mask API to query for that.

Svens patch looks right for how we are now using the DMA mask setting
API.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-24 21:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-15 14:45 allow larger than require DMA masks Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-15 14:45 ` [PATCH 1/5] ccio: allow large " Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-15 14:45 ` [PATCH 2/5] sparc64: refactor the ali DMA quirk Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-15 18:34   ` David Miller
2019-02-15 14:45 ` [PATCH 3/5] sparc64/iommu: allow large DMA masks Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-15 18:34   ` David Miller
2019-02-15 14:45 ` [PATCH 4/5] sparc64/pci_sun4v: " Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-15 18:35   ` David Miller
2019-02-15 14:45 ` [PATCH 5/5] Documentation/DMA-API-HOWTO: update dma_mask sections Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-18  1:26   ` Yang, Shunyong
2019-09-23 21:14 ` allow larger than require DMA masks Sven Schnelle
2019-09-24  0:59   ` James Bottomley
2019-09-24 21:25     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-09-24 21:59       ` James Bottomley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190924212554.GA31357@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=svens@stackframe.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox