From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA798C432C2 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 05:30:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE14222C3 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 05:30:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1569475803; bh=ih6FlBjGy8NvLVT5ABx1cYC1s8sHdn6Wkvf3RuY0i1k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=wJNnH8L2/t+fqZQLrqClLzyrkxGOEjFRGNEw+UWvb7MFkpwkecn1BdXJmAsgGKXXs ou9o/bWlyPGrwQ9nYEW8F5eGlAXBwxm/BDGJ/VaK2izpCeDhSDFwSr8T2XX1f3iyQy VE1Ka1ox3mL+Q/WmAHZ1o5b+k7oPxI82ylOnhrVA= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2392271AbfIZFaC (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Sep 2019 01:30:02 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:45854 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388384AbfIZFaC (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Sep 2019 01:30:02 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 289192146E; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 05:30:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1569475801; bh=ih6FlBjGy8NvLVT5ABx1cYC1s8sHdn6Wkvf3RuY0i1k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=054SUC9HpC/tYrn5c51FO5ks1yDgps8WdbO8lJMd/ugcQ877/HJ8aXWFSDjLz1btx +NuKazreoHFXhF/j/xWNqEnuyKniyjfEOOvvNCv++tWqLOAKtIsbFpbFb0nmdgF/mK qIQ3yqLRWwJBp3xCsEUTd1iuoz8DfP1xnDFMf4IA= Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 07:29:59 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Shubhrajyoti Datta Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, michal.simek@xilinx.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCHv2 1/3] dt-bindings: misc: Add dt bindings for flex noc Performance Monitor Message-ID: <20190926052959.GA1562021@kroah.com> References: <2de75a74ef4086090c532d3b80b7d6dcd115e45e.1569474867.git.shubhrajyoti.datta@xilinx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2de75a74ef4086090c532d3b80b7d6dcd115e45e.1569474867.git.shubhrajyoti.datta@xilinx.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 10:46:24AM +0530, Shubhrajyoti Datta wrote: > Add dt bindings for flexnoc Performance Monitor. > The flexnoc counters for read and write response and requests are > supported. > > Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti Datta > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/misc/xlnx,flexnoc.txt | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/xlnx,flexnoc.txt Why are these "RFC"? I guess you don't want them merged because you are not thinking that they are good enough? What needs to be done on them that you are sending them out now? greg k-h