From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
To: Ben Luo <luoben@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: alex.williamson@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfio/type1: remove hugepage checks in is_invalid_reserved_pfn()
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 12:41:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191003164133.GG13922@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1d6b7e1c40783f2db4c6cb15bf679a94222ec6a3.1570073993.git.luoben@linux.alibaba.com>
On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 11:49:42AM +0800, Ben Luo wrote:
> Currently, no hugepage split code can transfer the reserved bit
> from head to tail during the split, so checking the head can't make
> a difference in a racing condition with hugepage spliting.
>
> The buddy wouldn't allow a driver to allocate an hugepage if any
> subpage is reserved in the e820 map at boot, if any driver sets the
> reserved bit of head page before mapping the hugepage in userland,
> it needs to set the reserved bit in all subpages to be safe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Luo <luoben@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 26 ++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> index 054391f..e2019ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> @@ -287,31 +287,13 @@ static int vfio_lock_acct(struct vfio_dma *dma, long npage, bool async)
> * Some mappings aren't backed by a struct page, for example an mmap'd
> * MMIO range for our own or another device. These use a different
> * pfn conversion and shouldn't be tracked as locked pages.
> + * For compound pages, any driver that sets the reserved bit in head
> + * page needs to set the reserved bit in all subpages to be safe.
> */
> static bool is_invalid_reserved_pfn(unsigned long pfn)
> {
> - if (pfn_valid(pfn)) {
> - bool reserved;
> - struct page *tail = pfn_to_page(pfn);
> - struct page *head = compound_head(tail);
> - reserved = !!(PageReserved(head));
> - if (head != tail) {
> - /*
> - * "head" is not a dangling pointer
> - * (compound_head takes care of that)
> - * but the hugepage may have been split
> - * from under us (and we may not hold a
> - * reference count on the head page so it can
> - * be reused before we run PageReferenced), so
> - * we've to check PageTail before returning
> - * what we just read.
> - */
> - smp_rmb();
> - if (PageTail(tail))
> - return reserved;
> - }
> - return PageReserved(tail);
> - }
> + if (pfn_valid(pfn))
> + return PageReserved(pfn_to_page(pfn));
>
> return true;
> }
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-03 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-03 3:49 [PATCH] vfio/type1: remove hugepage checks in is_invalid_reserved_pfn() Ben Luo
2019-10-03 16:41 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2019-10-18 6:42 ` Ben Luo
2019-10-18 14:56 ` Alex Williamson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191003164133.GG13922@redhat.com \
--to=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luoben@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox