* [PATCH] uverbs: prevent potential underflow
@ 2019-10-05 5:23 Dan Carpenter
2019-10-08 19:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2019-10-05 5:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Doug Ledford, Potnuri Bharat Teja, Matan Barak
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe, Leon Romanovsky, Shamir Rabinovitch,
Matthew Wilcox, Michael Guralnik, linux-rdma, linux-kernel,
kernel-janitors
The issue is in drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_std_types_cq.c in the
UVERBS_HANDLER(UVERBS_METHOD_CQ_CREATE) function. We check that:
if (attr.comp_vector >= attrs->ufile->device->num_comp_vectors) {
But we don't check that "attr.comp_vector" whether negative. It
could potentially lead to an array underflow. My concern would be where
cq->vector is used in the create_cq() function from the cxgb4 driver.
Fixes: 9ee79fce3642 ("IB/core: Add completion queue (cq) object actions")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
---
drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs.h b/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs.h
index 1e5aeb39f774..63f7f7db5902 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs.h
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs.h
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ ib_uverbs_init_udata_buf_or_null(struct ib_udata *udata,
struct ib_uverbs_device {
atomic_t refcount;
- int num_comp_vectors;
+ u32 num_comp_vectors;
struct completion comp;
struct device dev;
/* First group for device attributes, NULL terminated array */
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] uverbs: prevent potential underflow 2019-10-05 5:23 [PATCH] uverbs: prevent potential underflow Dan Carpenter @ 2019-10-08 19:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe 2019-10-09 7:35 ` Dan Carpenter 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2019-10-08 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dan Carpenter Cc: Doug Ledford, Potnuri Bharat Teja, Matan Barak, Leon Romanovsky, Shamir Rabinovitch, Matthew Wilcox, Michael Guralnik, linux-rdma, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 08:23:37AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > The issue is in drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_std_types_cq.c in the > UVERBS_HANDLER(UVERBS_METHOD_CQ_CREATE) function. We check that: > > if (attr.comp_vector >= attrs->ufile->device->num_comp_vectors) { > > But we don't check that "attr.comp_vector" whether negative. It > could potentially lead to an array underflow. My concern would be where > cq->vector is used in the create_cq() function from the cxgb4 driver. > > Fixes: 9ee79fce3642 ("IB/core: Add completion queue (cq) object actions") > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> > --- > drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs.h b/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs.h > index 1e5aeb39f774..63f7f7db5902 100644 > --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs.h > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs.h > @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ ib_uverbs_init_udata_buf_or_null(struct ib_udata *udata, > > struct ib_uverbs_device { > atomic_t refcount; > - int num_comp_vectors; > + u32 num_comp_vectors; > struct completion comp; > struct device dev; > /* First group for device attributes, NULL terminated array */ I would have expected you to change struct ib_cq_init_attr ? Or at least both.. This is actually a bug as the type of UVERBS_ATTR_CREATE_CQ_COMP_VECTOR for userspace is u32: UVERBS_ATTR_PTR_IN(UVERBS_ATTR_CREATE_CQ_COMP_VECTOR, UVERBS_ATTR_TYPE(u32), UA_MANDATORY), But we are stuffing it into a int: ret = uverbs_copy_from(&attr.comp_vector, attrs, UVERBS_ATTR_CREATE_CQ_COMP_VECTOR); So very large values will become negative and switching num_comp_vectors to u32 won't help?? Jason ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] uverbs: prevent potential underflow 2019-10-08 19:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe @ 2019-10-09 7:35 ` Dan Carpenter 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Dan Carpenter @ 2019-10-09 7:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Doug Ledford, Potnuri Bharat Teja, Matan Barak, Leon Romanovsky, Shamir Rabinovitch, Matthew Wilcox, Michael Guralnik, linux-rdma, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 04:44:25PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 08:23:37AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > The issue is in drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_std_types_cq.c in the > > UVERBS_HANDLER(UVERBS_METHOD_CQ_CREATE) function. We check that: > > > > if (attr.comp_vector >= attrs->ufile->device->num_comp_vectors) { > > > > But we don't check that "attr.comp_vector" whether negative. It > > could potentially lead to an array underflow. My concern would be where > > cq->vector is used in the create_cq() function from the cxgb4 driver. > > > > Fixes: 9ee79fce3642 ("IB/core: Add completion queue (cq) object actions") > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> > > --- > > drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs.h | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs.h b/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs.h > > index 1e5aeb39f774..63f7f7db5902 100644 > > --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs.h > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs.h > > @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ ib_uverbs_init_udata_buf_or_null(struct ib_udata *udata, > > > > struct ib_uverbs_device { > > atomic_t refcount; > > - int num_comp_vectors; > > + u32 num_comp_vectors; > > struct completion comp; > > struct device dev; > > /* First group for device attributes, NULL terminated array */ > > I would have expected you to change struct ib_cq_init_attr ? Or at > least both.. > > This is actually a bug as the type of > UVERBS_ATTR_CREATE_CQ_COMP_VECTOR for userspace is u32: > > UVERBS_ATTR_PTR_IN(UVERBS_ATTR_CREATE_CQ_COMP_VECTOR, > UVERBS_ATTR_TYPE(u32), > UA_MANDATORY), > > But we are stuffing it into a int: > > ret = uverbs_copy_from(&attr.comp_vector, attrs, > UVERBS_ATTR_CREATE_CQ_COMP_VECTOR); > > So very large values will become negative and switching > num_comp_vectors to u32 won't help?? Yeah. You're right. I should have changed both. I'm not sure what I was thinking. My patch does fix the bug because of type promotion, but we should change both to u32. regards, dan carpenter ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-10-09 7:35 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2019-10-05 5:23 [PATCH] uverbs: prevent potential underflow Dan Carpenter 2019-10-08 19:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe 2019-10-09 7:35 ` Dan Carpenter
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox