From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Cc: knaack.h@gmx.de, lars@metafoo.de, pmeerw@pmeerw.net,
lee.jones@linaro.org, bleung@chromium.org,
enric.balletbo@collabora.com, dianders@chromium.org,
groeck@chromium.org, fabien.lahoudere@collabora.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/13] iio: cros_ec: Expose hwfifo_timeout
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2019 17:35:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191005173532.20fa7bcd@archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190922175021.53449-12-gwendal@chromium.org>
On Sun, 22 Sep 2019 10:50:19 -0700
Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org> wrote:
> Expose EC sampling rate through buffer/hwfifo_timeout.
This seems a bit odd unless EC term "sampling rate"
is rather different from what I'd expect. Code looks
fine though ;)
> Rename frequency to sampling_frequency to match IIO ABI.
That looks like a straight forward bug. We might
want to think about pushing that back to older kernels.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> ---
> .../common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors.c | 1 -
> .../cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c | 110 +++++++++++++-----
> drivers/iio/light/cros_ec_light_prox.c | 3 +-
> drivers/iio/pressure/cros_ec_baro.c | 3 +-
> 4 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors.c b/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors.c
> index b78a942ac8e5..95a4b4cf8f87 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors.c
> @@ -255,7 +255,6 @@ static int cros_ec_sensors_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBSCALE);
> channel->info_mask_shared_by_all =
> BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE) |
> - BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_FREQUENCY) |
> BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ);
> channel->info_mask_shared_by_all_available =
> BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ);
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c b/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c
> index c4c37c6df301..a31a761e3a81 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> #include <linux/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors_core.h>
> #include <linux/iio/iio.h>
> #include <linux/iio/kfifo_buf.h>
> +#include <linux/iio/sysfs.h>
> #include <linux/iio/trigger_consumer.h>
> #include <linux/iio/triggered_buffer.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> @@ -84,6 +85,75 @@ static void get_default_min_max_freq(enum motionsensor_type type,
> }
> }
>
> +static int cros_ec_sensor_set_ec_rate(struct cros_ec_sensors_core_state *st,
> + int rate)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&st->cmd_lock);
> + st->param.cmd = MOTIONSENSE_CMD_EC_RATE;
> + st->param.ec_rate.data = rate;
> + ret = cros_ec_motion_send_host_cmd(st, 0);
> + if (ret == 0)
> + st->curr_sampl_freq = rate;
> + mutex_unlock(&st->cmd_lock);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t cros_ec_sensor_set_report_latency(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr,
> + const char *buf, size_t len)
> +{
> + struct iio_dev *indio_dev = dev_to_iio_dev(dev);
> + struct cros_ec_sensors_core_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> + int integer, fract, ret;
> + int latency;
> +
> + ret = iio_str_to_fixpoint(buf, 100000, &integer, &fract);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + /* EC rate is in ms. */
> + latency = integer * 1000 + fract / 1000;
> + ret = cros_ec_sensor_set_ec_rate(st, latency);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return len;
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t cros_ec_sensor_get_report_latency(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr,
> + char *buf)
> +{
> + struct iio_dev *indio_dev = dev_to_iio_dev(dev);
> + struct cros_ec_sensors_core_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> + int latency, ret;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&st->cmd_lock);
> + st->param.cmd = MOTIONSENSE_CMD_EC_RATE;
> + st->param.ec_rate.data = EC_MOTION_SENSE_NO_VALUE;
> +
> + ret = cros_ec_motion_send_host_cmd(st, 0);
> + latency = st->resp->ec_rate.ret;
> + mutex_unlock(&st->cmd_lock);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return sprintf(buf, "%d.%06u\n",
> + latency / 1000,
> + (latency % 1000) * 1000);
> +}
> +
> +static IIO_DEVICE_ATTR(hwfifo_timeout, 0644,
> + cros_ec_sensor_get_report_latency,
> + cros_ec_sensor_set_report_latency, 0);
> +
> +static const struct attribute *cros_ec_sensor_fifo_attributes[] = {
> + &iio_dev_attr_hwfifo_timeout.dev_attr.attr,
> + NULL,
> +};
> +
> int cros_ec_sensors_push_data(
> struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> s16 *data,
> @@ -194,6 +264,9 @@ int cros_ec_sensors_core_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> if (!buffer)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> + iio_buffer_set_attrs(buffer,
> + cros_ec_sensor_fifo_attributes);
> +
> iio_device_attach_buffer(indio_dev, buffer);
> indio_dev->modes = INDIO_BUFFER_SOFTWARE;
> ret = cros_ec_sensorhub_register_push_data(
> @@ -553,18 +626,6 @@ int cros_ec_sensors_core_read(struct cros_ec_sensors_core_state *st,
>
> switch (mask) {
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
> - st->param.cmd = MOTIONSENSE_CMD_EC_RATE;
> - st->param.ec_rate.data =
> - EC_MOTION_SENSE_NO_VALUE;
> -
> - ret = cros_ec_motion_send_host_cmd(st, 0);
> - if (ret)
> - break;
> -
> - *val = st->resp->ec_rate.ret;
> - ret = IIO_VAL_INT;
> - break;
> - case IIO_CHAN_INFO_FREQUENCY:
> st->param.cmd = MOTIONSENSE_CMD_SENSOR_ODR;
> st->param.sensor_odr.data =
> EC_MOTION_SENSE_NO_VALUE;
> @@ -613,23 +674,16 @@ int cros_ec_sensors_core_write(struct cros_ec_sensors_core_state *st,
> int ret;
>
> switch (mask) {
> - case IIO_CHAN_INFO_FREQUENCY:
> + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
> st->param.cmd = MOTIONSENSE_CMD_SENSOR_ODR;
> st->param.sensor_odr.data = val;
>
> /* Always roundup, so caller gets at least what it asks for. */
> st->param.sensor_odr.roundup = 1;
>
> - ret = cros_ec_motion_send_host_cmd(st, 0);
> - break;
> - case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
> - st->param.cmd = MOTIONSENSE_CMD_EC_RATE;
> - st->param.ec_rate.data = val;
> -
> ret = cros_ec_motion_send_host_cmd(st, 0);
> if (ret)
> break;
> - st->curr_sampl_freq = val;
> break;
> default:
> ret = -EINVAL;
> @@ -643,6 +697,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused cros_ec_sensors_prepare(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct iio_dev *indio_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> struct cros_ec_sensors_core_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> + int ret = 0;
>
> if (st->curr_sampl_freq == 0)
> return 0;
> @@ -652,13 +707,10 @@ static int __maybe_unused cros_ec_sensors_prepare(struct device *dev)
> * sleep. Set sampling to a long period if necessary.
> */
> if (st->curr_sampl_freq < CROS_EC_MIN_SUSPEND_SAMPLING_FREQUENCY) {
> - mutex_lock(&st->cmd_lock);
> - st->param.cmd = MOTIONSENSE_CMD_EC_RATE;
> - st->param.ec_rate.data = CROS_EC_MIN_SUSPEND_SAMPLING_FREQUENCY;
> - cros_ec_motion_send_host_cmd(st, 0);
> - mutex_unlock(&st->cmd_lock);
> + ret = cros_ec_sensor_set_ec_rate(st,
> + CROS_EC_MIN_SUSPEND_SAMPLING_FREQUENCY);
> }
> - return 0;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static void __maybe_unused cros_ec_sensors_complete(struct device *dev)
> @@ -670,11 +722,7 @@ static void __maybe_unused cros_ec_sensors_complete(struct device *dev)
> return;
>
> if (st->curr_sampl_freq < CROS_EC_MIN_SUSPEND_SAMPLING_FREQUENCY) {
> - mutex_lock(&st->cmd_lock);
> - st->param.cmd = MOTIONSENSE_CMD_EC_RATE;
> - st->param.ec_rate.data = st->curr_sampl_freq;
> - cros_ec_motion_send_host_cmd(st, 0);
> - mutex_unlock(&st->cmd_lock);
> + cros_ec_sensor_set_ec_rate(st, st->curr_sampl_freq);
> }
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/cros_ec_light_prox.c b/drivers/iio/light/cros_ec_light_prox.c
> index d58f010880ce..e9b0072d5c88 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/light/cros_ec_light_prox.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/light/cros_ec_light_prox.c
> @@ -199,8 +199,7 @@ static int cros_ec_light_prox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> /* Common part */
> channel->info_mask_shared_by_all =
> - BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ) |
> - BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_FREQUENCY);
> + BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ);
> channel->info_mask_shared_by_all_available =
> BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ);
> channel->scan_type.realbits = CROS_EC_SENSOR_BITS;
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/pressure/cros_ec_baro.c b/drivers/iio/pressure/cros_ec_baro.c
> index c7538e93d24f..aa3cae5a1a15 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/pressure/cros_ec_baro.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/pressure/cros_ec_baro.c
> @@ -148,8 +148,7 @@ static int cros_ec_baro_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> channel->info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW);
> channel->info_mask_shared_by_all =
> BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE) |
> - BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ) |
> - BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_FREQUENCY);
> + BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ);
> channel->scan_type.realbits = CROS_EC_SENSOR_BITS;
> channel->scan_type.storagebits = CROS_EC_SENSOR_BITS;
> channel->scan_type.shift = 0;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-05 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-22 17:50 [PATCH 00/13] cros_ec: Add sensorhub driver and FIFO processing Gwendal Grignou
2019-09-22 17:50 ` [PATCH 01/13] mfd: cros_ec: Add sensor_count and make check_features public Gwendal Grignou
2019-09-30 13:15 ` Enric Balletbo i Serra
2019-09-30 16:24 ` Gwendal Grignou
2019-10-05 15:26 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-09-22 17:50 ` [PATCH 02/13] platform: cros_ec: Add cros_ec_sensor_hub driver Gwendal Grignou
2019-10-01 10:31 ` Enric Balletbo i Serra
2019-10-05 15:35 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-10-05 15:36 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-09-22 17:50 ` [PATCH 03/13] platform/mfd:iio: cros_ec: Register sensor through sensorhub Gwendal Grignou
2019-10-05 15:41 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-09-22 17:50 ` [PATCH 04/13] platform: chrome: cros-ec: record event timestamp in the hard irq Gwendal Grignou
2019-10-01 10:32 ` Enric Balletbo i Serra
2019-10-05 15:44 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-09-22 17:50 ` [PATCH 05/13] platform: chrome: cros_ec: Do not attempt to register a non-positive IRQ number Gwendal Grignou
2019-10-01 10:32 ` Enric Balletbo i Serra
2019-09-22 17:50 ` [PATCH 06/13] platform: chrome: cros_ec: handle MKBP more events flag Gwendal Grignou
2019-10-01 10:32 ` Enric Balletbo i Serra
2019-10-05 15:52 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-09-22 17:50 ` [PATCH 07/13] platform: chrome: sensorhub: Add FIFO support Gwendal Grignou
2019-10-05 16:08 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-10-05 16:14 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-09-22 17:50 ` [PATCH 08/13] platform: chrome: sensorhub: Add code to spread timestmap Gwendal Grignou
2019-10-05 16:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-09-22 17:50 ` [PATCH 09/13] platform: chrome: sensorhub: Add median filter Gwendal Grignou
2019-10-05 16:24 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-09-22 17:50 ` [PATCH 10/13] iio: cros_ec: Use triggered buffer only when EC does not support FIFO Gwendal Grignou
2019-10-05 16:30 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-09-22 17:50 ` [PATCH 11/13] iio: cros_ec: Expose hwfifo_timeout Gwendal Grignou
2019-10-05 16:35 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2019-09-22 17:50 ` [PATCH 12/13] iio: cros_ec: Report hwfifo_watermark_max Gwendal Grignou
2019-10-05 16:37 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-09-22 17:50 ` [PATCH 13/13] iio: cros_ec: Use Hertz as unit for sampling frequency Gwendal Grignou
2019-10-05 16:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-10-05 15:39 ` [PATCH 00/13] cros_ec: Add sensorhub driver and FIFO processing Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191005173532.20fa7bcd@archlinux \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=bleung@chromium.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=enric.balletbo@collabora.com \
--cc=fabien.lahoudere@collabora.com \
--cc=groeck@chromium.org \
--cc=gwendal@chromium.org \
--cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox