From: "mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com" <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Nicholas Johnson <nicholas.johnson-opensource@outlook.com.au>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"corbet@lwn.net" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"benh@kernel.crashing.org" <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
"logang@deltatee.com" <logang@deltatee.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 6/6] PCI: Fix bug resulting in double hpmemsize being assigned to MMIO window
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 15:27:10 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191008122710.GK2819@lahna.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SL2P216MB018781FEDD139047FCBE42AB80C00@SL2P216MB0187.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 12:55:03PM +0000, Nicholas Johnson wrote:
> Background
> ==========================================================================
I don't think the above are needed.
> Currently, the kernel can sometimes assign the MMIO_PREF window
> additional size into the MMIO window, resulting in double the MMIO
> additional size, even if the MMIO_PREF window was successful.
>
> This happens if in the first pass, the MMIO_PREF succeeds but the MMIO
> fails. In the next pass, because MMIO_PREF is already assigned, the
> attempt to assign MMIO_PREF returns an error code instead of success
> (nothing more to do, already allocated).
>
> Example of problem (more context can be found in the bug report URL):
Maybe add bit more context in the changelog. Also explain how the
problem can be reproduced.
> Mainline kernel:
> pci 0000:06:01.0: BAR 14: assigned [mem 0x90100000-0xa00fffff] = 256M
> pci 0000:06:04.0: BAR 14: assigned [mem 0xa0200000-0xb01fffff] = 256M
>
> Patched kernel:
> pci 0000:06:01.0: BAR 14: assigned [mem 0x90100000-0x980fffff] = 128M
> pci 0000:06:04.0: BAR 14: assigned [mem 0x98200000-0xa01fffff] = 128M
>
> This was using pci=realloc,hpmemsize=128M,nocrs - on the same machine
> with the same configuration, with a Ubuntu mainline kernel and a kernel
> patched with this patch series.
>
> This patch is vital for the next patch in the series. The next patch
There is no next patch in the patch series ;-)
> allows the user to specify MMIO and MMIO_PREF independently. If the
> MMIO_PREF is set to be very large, this bug will end up more than
> doubling the MMIO size. The bug results in the MMIO_PREF being added to
> the MMIO window, which means doubling if MMIO_PREF size == MMIO size.
> With a large MMIO_PREF, without this patch, the MMIO window will likely
> fail to be assigned altogether due to lack of 32-bit address space.
>
> Patch notes
> ==========================================================================
Here also the above two lines are not needed.
> Change find_free_bus_resource() to not skip assigned resources with
> non-null parent.
>
> Add checks in pbus_size_io() and pbus_size_mem() to return success if
> resource returned from find_free_bus_resource() is already allocated.
>
> This avoids pbus_size_io() and pbus_size_mem() returning error code to
> __pci_bus_size_bridges() when a resource has been successfully assigned
> in a previous pass. This fixes the existing behaviour where space for a
> resource could be reserved multiple times in different parent bridge
> windows. This also greatly reduces the number of failed BAR messages in
> dmesg when Linux assigns resources.
>
> See related from Logan Gunthorpe (same problem, different solution):
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190531171216.20532-2-logang@deltatee.com/T/#u
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190531171216.20532-2-logang@deltatee.com/T/#u
> Solves bug report: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203243
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203243
The patch itself looks good to me.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-08 12:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-26 12:55 [PATCH v8 6/6] PCI: Fix bug resulting in double hpmemsize being assigned to MMIO window Nicholas Johnson
2019-10-08 12:27 ` mika.westerberg [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191008122710.GK2819@lahna.fi.intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=nicholas.johnson-opensource@outlook.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox