From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
paulmck@kernel.org
Subject: x86/kprobes bug? (was: [PATCH 1/3] x86/alternatives: Teach text_poke_bp() to emulate instructions)
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 15:07:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191009130754.GL2311@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191004224540.766dc0fd824bcd5b8baa2f4c@kernel.org>
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 10:45:40PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > > > > text_poke_bp(op->kp.addr, insn_buff, RELATIVEJUMP_SIZE,
> > > > > - op->optinsn.insn);
> > > > > + emulate_buff);
> > > > > }
> > >
> > > As argued in a previous thread, text_poke_bp() is broken when it changes
> > > more than a single instruction at a time.
> > >
> > > Now, ISTR optimized kprobes does something like:
> > >
> > > poke INT3
> >
> > Hmm, it does this using text_poke(), but lacks a
> > on_each_cpu(do_sync_core, NULL, 1), which I suppose is OK-ish IFF you do
> > that synchronize_rcu_tasks() after it, but less so if you don't.
> >
> > That is, without either, you can't really tell if the kprobe is in
> > effect or not.
>
> Yes, it doesn't wait the change by design at this moment.
Right, this might surprise some, I suppose, and I might've found a small
issue with it, see below.
> > > synchronize_rcu_tasks() /* waits for all tasks to schedule
> > > guarantees instructions after INT3
> > > are unused */
> > > install optimized probe /* overwrites multiple instrctions with
> > > JMP.d32 */
> > >
> > > And the above then undoes that by:
> > >
> > > poke INT3 on top of the optimzed probe
> > >
> > > poke tail instructions back /* guaranteed safe because the
> > > above INT3 poke ensures the
> > > JMP.d32 instruction is unused */
> > >
> > > poke head byte back
>
> Yes, anyway, the last poke should recover another INT3... (for kprobe)
It does indeed.
> > > Is this correct? If so, we should probably put a comment in there
> > > explaining how all this is unusual but safe.
So from what I can tell of kernel/kprobes.c, what it does is something like:
ARM: (__arm_kprobe)
text_poke(INT3)
/* guarantees nothing, INT3 will become visible at some point, maybe */
(kprobe_optimizer)
if (opt) {
/* guarantees the bytes after INT3 are unused */
syncrhonize_rcu_tasks();
text_poke_bp(JMP32);
/* implies IPI-sync, kprobe really is enabled */
}
DISARM: (__unregister_kprobe_top)
if (opt) {
text_poke_bp(INT3 + tail);
/* implies IPI-sync, so tail is guaranteed visible */
}
text_poke(old);
FREE: (__unregister_kprobe_bottom)
/* guarantees 'old' is visible and the kprobe really is unused, maybe */
synchronize_rcu();
free();
Now the problem is that I don't think the synchronize_rcu() at free
implies enough to guarantee 'old' really is visible on all CPUs.
Similarly, I don't think synchronize_rcu_tasks() is sufficient on the
ARM side either. It only provides the guarantee -provided- the INT3 is
actually visible. If it is not, all bets are off.
I'd feel much better if we switch arch_arm_kprobe() over to using
text_poke_bp(). Or at the very least add the on_each_cpu(do_sync_core)
to it.
Hmm?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-09 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-27 18:06 [PATCH 0/3] Rewrite x86/ftrace to use text_poke() Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-27 18:06 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/alternatives: Teach text_poke_bp() to emulate instructions Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-03 5:00 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-10-03 8:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-03 11:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-03 12:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-04 13:45 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-10-07 8:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-09 13:07 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-10-09 13:26 ` x86/kprobes bug? (was: [PATCH 1/3] x86/alternatives: Teach text_poke_bp() to emulate instructions) Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-09 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-09 14:26 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-10-17 19:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-03 13:05 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/alternatives: Teach text_poke_bp() to emulate instructions Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-27 18:06 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86/alternatives,jump_label: Provide better text_poke() batching interface Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-02 16:34 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2019-10-03 5:50 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-08-27 18:06 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86/ftrace: Use text_poke() Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-02 16:35 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2019-10-02 18:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-03 22:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-10-04 8:10 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2019-10-04 13:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-10-04 14:44 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2019-10-04 15:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-10-07 8:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-11 7:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-11 7:37 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2019-10-11 10:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-11 13:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-10-04 11:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-04 13:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-10-22 0:36 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-22 0:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-10-22 3:10 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-22 3:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-10-22 3:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-10-22 4:05 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-22 11:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-10-22 13:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-10-22 17:50 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-22 18:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-10-22 20:46 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-22 21:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-10-22 21:58 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-22 22:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-10-23 2:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-10-22 22:45 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-10-22 23:21 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-10-22 23:49 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-23 4:20 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-10-23 9:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-23 16:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-10-23 17:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-10-23 19:34 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-23 20:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-10-23 22:36 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-22 3:55 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-03 5:52 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-08-28 7:22 ` [PATCH 0/3] Rewrite x86/ftrace to use text_poke() Song Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191009130754.GL2311@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox