From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: "Paul Elliott" <paul.elliott@arm.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Will Deacon" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
"Yu-cheng Yu" <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>,
"Amit Kachhap" <amit.kachhap@arm.com>,
"Vincenzo Frascino" <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
"Eugene Syromiatnikov" <esyr@redhat.com>,
"Szabolcs Nagy" <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
"Andrew Jones" <drjones@redhat.com>,
"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>, "Jann Horn" <jannh@google.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
"Kristina Martšenko" <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Florian Weimer" <fweimer@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Sudakshina Das" <sudi.das@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/12] arm64: BTI: Reset BTYPE when skipping emulated instructions
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 15:47:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191011144743.GJ27757@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191011142157.GC33537@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 03:21:58PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 07:44:39PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> > Since normal execution of any non-branch instruction resets the
> > PSTATE BTYPE field to 0, so do the same thing when emulating a
> > trapped instruction.
> >
> > Branches don't trap directly, so we should never need to assign a
> > non-zero value to BTYPE here.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> > index 3af2768..4d8ce50 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> > @@ -331,6 +331,8 @@ void arm64_skip_faulting_instruction(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long size)
> >
> > if (regs->pstate & PSR_MODE32_BIT)
> > advance_itstate(regs);
> > + else
> > + regs->pstate &= ~(u64)PSR_BTYPE_MASK;
>
> This looks good to me, with one nit below.
>
> We don't (currently) need the u64 cast here, and it's inconsistent with
> what we do elsewhere. If the upper 32-bit of pstate get allocated, we'll
> need to fix up all the other masking we do:
Huh, looks like I missed that. Dang. Will fix.
> [mark@lakrids:~/src/linux]% git grep 'pstate &= ~'
> arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c: regs->pstate &= ~PSR_AA32_E_BIT;
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c: regs->pstate &= ~PSR_SSBS_BIT;
> arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c: regs->pstate &= ~DBG_SPSR_SS;
> arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c: pstate &= ~(pstate >> 1); /* PSR_C_BIT &= ~PSR_Z_BIT */
> arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c: pstate &= ~(pstate >> 1); /* PSR_C_BIT &= ~PSR_Z_BIT */
> arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c: regs->pstate &= ~PSR_D_BIT;
> arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c: regs->pstate &= ~DAIF_MASK;
> arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c: regs->pstate &= ~SPSR_EL1_AARCH32_RES0_BITS;
> arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c: regs->pstate &= ~PSR_AA32_E_BIT;
> arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c: regs->pstate &= ~SPSR_EL1_AARCH64_RES0_BITS;
> arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c: regs->pstate &= ~DBG_SPSR_SS;
> arch/arm64/kernel/ssbd.c: task_pt_regs(task)->pstate &= ~val;
> arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c: regs->pstate &= ~PSR_AA32_IT_MASK;
>
> ... and at that point I'd suggest we should just ensure the bit
> definitions are all defined as unsigned long in the first place since
> adding casts to each use is error-prone.
Are we concerned about changing the types of UAPI #defines? That can
cause subtle and unexpected breakage, especially when the signedness
of a #define changes.
Ideally, we'd just change all these to 1UL << n.
Cheers
---Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-11 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-10 18:44 [PATCH v2 00/12] arm64: ARMv8.5-A: Branch Target Identification support Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] ELF: UAPI and Kconfig additions for ELF program properties Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] ELF: Add ELF program property parsing support Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] mm: Reserve asm-generic prot flag 0x10 for arch use Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] arm64: docs: cpu-feature-registers: Document ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 Dave Martin
2019-10-11 13:19 ` Alex Bennée
2019-10-11 14:51 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-21 19:18 ` Mark Brown
2019-10-22 10:32 ` Will Deacon
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] arm64: Basic Branch Target Identification support Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:06 ` [FIXUP 0/2] Fixups to patch 5 Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:06 ` [FIXUP 1/2] squash! arm64: Basic Branch Target Identification support Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:06 ` [FIXUP 2/2] " Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:10 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] " Mark Rutland
2019-10-11 15:25 ` Richard Henderson
2019-10-11 15:32 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:40 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-11 15:44 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 16:01 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 16:42 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-18 11:05 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-18 13:36 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 17:20 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-18 11:10 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-18 13:37 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-18 11:16 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-18 13:40 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] elf: Allow arch to tweak initial mmap prot flags Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] arm64: elf: Enable BTI at exec based on ELF program properties Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] arm64: BTI: Decode BYTPE bits when printing PSTATE Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:31 ` Richard Henderson
2019-10-11 15:33 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] arm64: traps: Fix inconsistent faulting instruction skipping Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:24 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-15 15:21 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-15 16:42 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-15 16:49 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-18 16:40 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-22 11:09 ` Robin Murphy
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] arm64: traps: Shuffle code to eliminate forward declarations Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] arm64: BTI: Reset BTYPE when skipping emulated instructions Dave Martin
2019-10-11 14:21 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-11 14:47 ` Dave Martin [this message]
2019-10-18 11:04 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-18 14:49 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] KVM: " Dave Martin
2019-10-11 14:24 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-11 14:44 ` Dave Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191011144743.GJ27757@arm.com \
--to=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=amit.kachhap@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=esyr@redhat.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kristina.martsenko@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=paul.elliott@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=sudi.das@arm.com \
--cc=szabolcs.nagy@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).