From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A29FC4CECE for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 12:49:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D224A2067B for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 12:49:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1571057349; bh=Mv+8RO/f9Lckl8079OLG7AxGYv4LcZhS1BTN4z7pAHo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=Ccenz2UO27TTVRaX3RjpEqvn81OSE6LzDuHdyVNvjyNU1hF3+F1JqL10BNvurpzuU Q2KTATUb7PKVyqARnZp6c/0WAcszZJweGO6ZHUwB5J/6QGz0ien+tjgIMmXpJ8RNPW buPr31PLDHk+nvfJDcJKffgU/9aRmBam3xtZuMzo= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731296AbfJNMtI (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Oct 2019 08:49:08 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:54384 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731092AbfJNMtI (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Oct 2019 08:49:08 -0400 Received: from dragon (li937-157.members.linode.com [45.56.119.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2ACAA20673; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 12:49:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1571057348; bh=Mv+8RO/f9Lckl8079OLG7AxGYv4LcZhS1BTN4z7pAHo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=XYn4a3dbfskzkrK+eqCKKlfM4wJxeu4Xrk1wI3mV16iOpq5BueEQiQj5oE0N6Ele3 O99IGZZ9048NUm3wrvuTdSypEyHjHfR5dEfzEQtIQSPS/cjsVgkaXmu8T9CF+ZjRBo u2JudmZ+VpmnYmUHgQrkIi4fQVRkunQYxHEpPXVg= Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 20:48:51 +0800 From: Shawn Guo To: Anson Huang Cc: s.hauer@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de, festevam@gmail.com, aisheng.dong@nxp.com, leonard.crestez@nxp.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux-imx@nxp.com Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] firmware: imx: Skip return value check for some special SCU firmware APIs Message-ID: <20191014124849.GR12262@dragon> References: <1570410959-32563-1-git-send-email-Anson.Huang@nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1570410959-32563-1-git-send-email-Anson.Huang@nxp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 09:15:59AM +0800, Anson Huang wrote: > The SCU firmware does NOT always have return value stored in message > header's function element even the API has response data, those special > APIs are defined as void function in SCU firmware, so they should be > treated as return success always. > > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang Applied, thanks.