From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7B89ECE588 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 17:46:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C509C2086A for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 17:46:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388873AbfJORqV (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Oct 2019 13:46:21 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:44586 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726038AbfJORqV (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Oct 2019 13:46:21 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72400337; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:46:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arrakis.emea.arm.com (arrakis.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C13993F6C4; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:46:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 18:46:16 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, f.fainelli@gmail.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, mbrugger@suse.com, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Robin Murphy , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, wahrenst@gmx.net Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/5] ARM: Raspberry Pi 4 DMA support Message-ID: <20191015174616.GO13874@arrakis.emea.arm.com> References: <20191014183108.24804-1-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de> <20191014205859.GA7634@iMac-3.local> <384b42df01c0af973002fba0d5f02068e7f2e7b3.camel@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <384b42df01c0af973002fba0d5f02068e7f2e7b3.camel@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 09:48:22AM +0200, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote: > A little off topic but I was wondering if you have a preferred way to refer to > the arm architecture in a way that it unambiguously excludes arm64 (for example > arm32 would work). arm32 should be fine. Neither arm64 nor arm32 are officially endorsed ARM Ltd names (officially the exception model is AArch32 while the instruction set is one of A32/T32/T16). -- Catalin