From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8586ECE599 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 07:08:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAAC120873 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 07:08:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732565AbfJPHIc (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Oct 2019 03:08:32 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:59282 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726338AbfJPHIc (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Oct 2019 03:08:32 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 4A9C168B20; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 09:08:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 09:08:27 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Max Filippov Cc: linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Chris Zankel , Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] xtensa: implement arch_dma_coherent_to_pfn Message-ID: <20191016070827.GA23051@lst.de> References: <20191015212526.1775-1-jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191015212526.1775-1-jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 02:25:26PM -0700, Max Filippov wrote: > Add trivial implementation for arch_dma_coherent_to_pfn. > This change enables communication with PCI ALSA devices through mmapped > buffers. This looks fine, although I'd much rather convert xtensa to the generic DMA remap / uncached segment support. Do you want this fix for 5.4? If so please queue it up ASAP so that I can do the proper thing for 5.5. If you don't need it that urgent I'd rather go straight to the generic code.