From: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: yamada.masahiro@socionext.com, michal.lkml@markovi.net,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bfields@fieldses.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts : prune-kernel : prune kernels generalized way
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 11:49:28 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191017061925.GA1274@Gentoo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <307349e6-69b0-b894-a2b9-edfd5b0fe4c7@infradead.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3999 bytes --]
On 09:08 Wed 16 Oct 2019, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>On 10/15/19 11:13 PM, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
>> This patch will remove old kernel from the system in a selective way.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> Thanks, a bunch to Randy for the hand holding . :)
>
>Hi Bhaskar,
>
>First problem is that patch complains:
>
>checking file scripts/prune-kernel
>Using Plan A...
>patch: **** malformed patch at line 87: 2.21.0
>
>IOW, this patch does not apply cleanly.
Whoops! Sending the patch with all the corrections.
>More comments below.
>
>
>> scripts/prune-kernel | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/scripts/prune-kernel b/scripts/prune-kernel
>> index e8aa940bc0a9..78dd4c854b2b 100755
>> --- a/scripts/prune-kernel
>> +++ b/scripts/prune-kernel
>> @@ -5,17 +5,64 @@
>> # again, /boot and /lib/modules/ eventually fill up.
>> # Dumb script to purge that stuff:
>>
>> +#for f in "$@"
>> +#do
>> +# if rpm -qf "/lib/modules/$f" >/dev/null; then
>> +# echo "keeping $f (installed from rpm)"
>> +# elif [ $(uname -r) = "$f" ]; then
>> +# echo "keeping $f (running kernel) "
>> +# else
>> +# echo "removing $f"
>> +# rm -f "/boot/initramfs-$f.img" "/boot/System.map-$f"
>> +# rm -f "/boot/vmlinuz-$f" "/boot/config-$f"
>> +# rm -rf "/lib/modules/$f"
>> +# new-kernel-pkg --remove $f
>> +# fi
>> +#done
>> +boot_dir=/boot
>> +modules_dir=/lib/modules
>> +
>> +function remove_old_kernel(){
>> + cd $boot_dir
>> + rm -If vmlinuz-$kenrel_version System.map-$kernel_version config-$kernel_verison
>
>Typos:
> $kernel_version $kernel_version
>
>I.e., you can't have tested this.
>
Fixed.
>> +}
>> +function remove_old_kernel_modules_dir(){
>> + cd $modules_dir
>> + rm -rf $modules_version
>> +}
>> +printf "\n\n Enlist the installed kernels \n\n"
>> +
>> +find $boot_dir -name "vmlinuz-*" -type f -exec ls -1 {} \;
>> +
>> +printf "\n\n\n Please give the kernel version to remove: %s"
>> +read kernel_version
>> +
>
>If I enter nothing here, no need to call remove_old_kernel.
>
Okay, terminate it there, because allowing defeat the purpose
of the script.
>> +remove_old_kernel
>> +
>> +printf "\n\n Enlist the installed modules directory \n\n"
>> +
>> +find $modules_dir -maxdepth 0 -type d -exec ls -1 {} \;
>> +
>> +printf "\n\n Please give the full modules directory name to remove: %s"
>> +read modules_version
>
>If I enter nothing here, don't call remove_old_kernel_modules_dir.
>
It will not reach here, because we have terminated it above.
>> +
>> +remove_old_kernel_modules_dir
>> +
>> +printf "\n\n Removed kernel version: $kernel_version and associcated modules: $modules_version ...Done \n"
>
> typo: associated
>
Fixed.
>> +while :
>> do
>
>Why is the "do" line missing a '+'? The only do/done in the current script
>are already listed above as being commented out.
>
>> +printf "\n\n Do you want to remove another?[YN] : %s"
>> +read response
>> +
>> +if [[ $response == "Y" ]];then
>> + printf "Please give another version to remove : %s"
>> + read kernel_version
>> + remove_old_kernel
>> + printf "\n\n Please give the full modules directory name to remove: %s"
>> + read modules_version
>> + remove_old_kernel_modules_dir
>> +elif [[ $response == "N" ]];then
>> + printf "\n\n Alright,no more. \n\n"
>
>Just exit, no printf needed.
>
>> + exit 1
>> +fi
>> done
>Same comment for "done" as for "do" above.
I must have done something wrong that is why...now fixed it.
>
>> --
>> 2.21.0
>
>
Thank you Randy, and extremely sorry to gobbles up your and everyones
time...heck..
>--
>~Randy
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-17 6:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-16 6:13 [PATCH] scripts : prune-kernel : prune kernels generalized way Bhaskar Chowdhury
2019-10-16 16:08 ` Randy Dunlap
2019-10-17 6:19 ` Bhaskar Chowdhury [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-10-17 6:31 Bhaskar Chowdhury
2019-10-17 20:16 ` Randy Dunlap
2019-10-17 23:00 ` Bhaskar Chowdhury
2019-10-19 13:07 [PATCH] scripts: " Bhaskar Chowdhury
2019-10-19 16:01 ` J. Bruce Fields
2019-10-19 22:16 ` Bhaskar Chowdhury
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191017061925.GA1274@Gentoo \
--to=unixbhaskar@gmail.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).