Re: [PATCH] omapfb: reduce stack usage

[Ladislav Michl <ladis@linux-mips.org>]

On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 05:30:04PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> The build of xtensa allmodconfig is giving a warning of:
> In function 'dsi_dump_dsidev_irqs':
> warning: the frame size of 1120 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes
> 
> Allocate the memory for 'struct dsi_irq_stats' dynamically instead
> of assigning it in stack.

So now function can fail silently, executes longer, code is sligthly
bigger... And all that to silent warning about exceeding frame size.
Is it really worth "fixing"?

> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/dsi.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/dsi.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/dsi.c
> index d620376216e1..43402467bf40 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/dsi.c
> @@ -1536,22 +1536,25 @@ static void dsi_dump_dsidev_irqs(struct platform_device *dsidev,
>  {
>  	struct dsi_data *dsi = dsi_get_dsidrv_data(dsidev);
>  	unsigned long flags;
> -	struct dsi_irq_stats stats;
> +	struct dsi_irq_stats *stats;
>  
> +	stats = kmalloc(sizeof(*stats), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!stats)
> +		return;
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&dsi->irq_stats_lock, flags);
>  
> -	stats = dsi->irq_stats;
> +	memcpy(stats, &dsi->irq_stats, sizeof(*stats));
>  	memset(&dsi->irq_stats, 0, sizeof(dsi->irq_stats));
>  	dsi->irq_stats.last_reset = jiffies;
>  
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dsi->irq_stats_lock, flags);
>  
>  	seq_printf(s, "period %u ms\n",
> -			jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies - stats.last_reset));
> +			jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies - stats->last_reset));
>  
> -	seq_printf(s, "irqs %d\n", stats.irq_count);
> +	seq_printf(s, "irqs %d\n", stats->irq_count);
>  #define PIS(x) \
> -	seq_printf(s, "%-20s %10d\n", #x, stats.dsi_irqs[ffs(DSI_IRQ_##x)-1]);
> +	seq_printf(s, "%-20s %10d\n", #x, stats->dsi_irqs[ffs(DSI_IRQ_##x)-1]);
>  
>  	seq_printf(s, "-- DSI%d interrupts --\n", dsi->module_id + 1);
>  	PIS(VC0);
> @@ -1575,10 +1578,10 @@ static void dsi_dump_dsidev_irqs(struct platform_device *dsidev,
>  
>  #define PIS(x) \
>  	seq_printf(s, "%-20s %10d %10d %10d %10d\n", #x, \
> -			stats.vc_irqs[0][ffs(DSI_VC_IRQ_##x)-1], \
> -			stats.vc_irqs[1][ffs(DSI_VC_IRQ_##x)-1], \
> -			stats.vc_irqs[2][ffs(DSI_VC_IRQ_##x)-1], \
> -			stats.vc_irqs[3][ffs(DSI_VC_IRQ_##x)-1]);
> +			stats->vc_irqs[0][ffs(DSI_VC_IRQ_##x)-1], \
> +			stats->vc_irqs[1][ffs(DSI_VC_IRQ_##x)-1], \
> +			stats->vc_irqs[2][ffs(DSI_VC_IRQ_##x)-1], \
> +			stats->vc_irqs[3][ffs(DSI_VC_IRQ_##x)-1]);
>  
>  	seq_printf(s, "-- VC interrupts --\n");
>  	PIS(CS);
> @@ -1594,7 +1597,7 @@ static void dsi_dump_dsidev_irqs(struct platform_device *dsidev,
>  
>  #define PIS(x) \
>  	seq_printf(s, "%-20s %10d\n", #x, \
> -			stats.cio_irqs[ffs(DSI_CIO_IRQ_##x)-1]);
> +			stats->cio_irqs[ffs(DSI_CIO_IRQ_##x)-1]);
>  
>  	seq_printf(s, "-- CIO interrupts --\n");
>  	PIS(ERRSYNCESC1);
> @@ -1618,6 +1621,7 @@ static void dsi_dump_dsidev_irqs(struct platform_device *dsidev,
>  	PIS(ULPSACTIVENOT_ALL0);
>  	PIS(ULPSACTIVENOT_ALL1);
>  #undef PIS
> +	kfree(stats);
>  }
>  
>  static void dsi1_dump_irqs(struct seq_file *s)
> -- 
> 2.11.0