From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5431CA9EA9 for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 21:55:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F8AD20872 for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 21:55:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726129AbfJRVzx (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Oct 2019 17:55:53 -0400 Received: from mga07.intel.com ([134.134.136.100]:20350 "EHLO mga07.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725806AbfJRVzw (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Oct 2019 17:55:52 -0400 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Oct 2019 14:55:52 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.67,313,1566889200"; d="scan'208";a="371587819" Received: from tassilo.jf.intel.com (HELO tassilo.localdomain) ([10.7.201.137]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Oct 2019 14:55:52 -0700 Received: by tassilo.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1ABF5300481; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 14:55:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 14:55:52 -0700 From: Andi Kleen To: Joe Perches Cc: Miguel Ojeda , Lars Poeschel , Vadim Bendebury , Willy Tarreau , Ksenija Stanojevic , open list , Geert Uytterhoeven , Geert Uytterhoeven , Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] auxdisplay: Make charlcd.[ch] more general Message-ID: <20191018215552.GX9933@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: <20191016082430.5955-1-poeschel@lemonage.de> <20191017080741.GA17556@lem-wkst-02.lemonage> <5348febc85ad3460f4e06ff11bf58ec70f6b3a48.camel@perches.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5348febc85ad3460f4e06ff11bf58ec70f6b3a48.camel@perches.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 08:33:26AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Fri, 2019-10-18 at 17:08 +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 10:07 AM Lars Poeschel wrote: > [] > > > Oh by the way: Do you know what I can do to make checkpatch happy with > > > its describing of the config symbol ? I tried writing a help paragraph > > > for the config symbols in Kconfig, but that did not help. > > > > CC'ing Joe. > > add > --ignore=CONFIG_DESCRIPTION > or > --min-conf-desc-length=1 (default is 4) > > to the checkpatch command line, or just ignore it. > > AK: I guess there's still some debate as to the proper > minimum length of a Kconfig help section paragraph. I still think four lines is a good minimum If it's not worth writing 4 lines for, perhaps the Kconfig symbol is not needed at all? -Andi