linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: flush any pending policy update work scheduled before freeing
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 11:27:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191021102730.GA21581@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191021021551.bjhf74zeyuqcl4w3@vireshk-i7>

On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 07:45:51AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 18-10-19, 12:06, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > Callstack is:
> >
> > (cpufreq_notifier_max)
> > (notifier_call_chain)
> > (blocking_notifier_call_chain)
> > (pm_qos_update_target)
> > (freq_qos_apply)
> > (freq_qos_remove_request)
> > (cpufreq_policy_free)
> > (subsys_interface_unregister)
> > (cpufreq_unregister_driver)
>
> @sudeep: I see that the patch is merged now, but as I said earlier the
> reasoning isn't clear yet. Please don't stop working on this and lets
> clean this once and for all.
>

Sure.

> What patches were you testing this with? My buggy patches or Rafael's
> patches as well ? At least with my patches, this can happen due to the
> other bug where the notifier doesn't get removed (as I said earlier),
> but once that bug isn't there then this shouldn't happen, else we have
> another bug in pipeline somewhere and should find it.
>

I just tested now with today's linux-pm/bleeding-edge branch.
And even if I move cancel_work_sync just after freq_qos_remove_notifier,
it works fine now. It was not the case on Friday.

Is that what you wanted to check or something else ?

Regards,
Sudeep

-->8

diff --git i/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c w/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 829a3764df1b..48a224a6b178 100644
--- i/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ w/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1268,6 +1268,9 @@ static void cpufreq_policy_free(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
        freq_qos_remove_notifier(&policy->constraints, FREQ_QOS_MIN,
                                 &policy->nb_min);

+       /* Cancel any pending policy->update work before freeing the policy. */
+       cancel_work_sync(&policy->update);
+
        if (policy->max_freq_req) {
                /*
                 * CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY notification is sent only after
@@ -1279,8 +1282,6 @@ static void cpufreq_policy_free(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
        }

        freq_qos_remove_request(policy->min_freq_req);
-       /* Cancel any pending policy->update work before freeing the policy. */
-       cancel_work_sync(&policy->update);
        kfree(policy->min_freq_req);

        cpufreq_policy_put_kobj(policy);


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-10-21 10:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-17 16:35 [PATCH] cpufreq: flush any pending policy update work scheduled before freeing Sudeep Holla
2019-10-17 19:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-17 21:26   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-18  5:55     ` Sudeep Holla
2019-10-18  6:02       ` Viresh Kumar
2019-10-18  7:32         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-18  8:03           ` Viresh Kumar
2019-10-18  8:19             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-18  8:25               ` Viresh Kumar
2019-10-18 10:19         ` Sudeep Holla
2019-10-18 10:37           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-18 11:06             ` Sudeep Holla
2019-10-21  0:14               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-21 10:33                 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-10-21  2:15               ` Viresh Kumar
2019-10-21  8:20                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-21 10:27                 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2019-10-21 10:55                   ` Viresh Kumar
2019-10-18  5:47   ` Sudeep Holla
2019-10-18  5:38 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-10-18  7:53   ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191021102730.GA21581@bogus \
    --to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).