From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Cc: arnd@arndb.de, broonie@kernel.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, baohua@kernel.org,
stephan@gerhold.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] mfd: cs5535-mfd: Use PLATFORM_DEVID_* defines and tidy error message
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 12:35:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191021113529.GB4365@dell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191021113316.GA4365@dell>
On Mon, 21 Oct 2019, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Oct 2019, Daniel Thompson wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 11:58:14AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > In most contexts '-1' doesn't really mean much to the casual observer.
> > > In almost all cases, it's better to use a human readable define. In
> > > this case PLATFORM_DEVID_* defines have already been provided for this
> > > purpose.
> > >
> > > While we're here, let's be specific about the 'MFD devices' which
> > > failed. It will help when trying to distinguish which of the 2 sets
> > > of sub-devices we actually failed to register.
> >
> > No objections... but won't the tag added by dev_err() already
> > disambiguate?
>
> The difference will be between CS5532 and CS5532 OLPC.
>
> Please see patch 4 in the series.
>
> > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/mfd/cs5535-mfd.c | 5 +++--
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/cs5535-mfd.c b/drivers/mfd/cs5535-mfd.c
> > > index f1825c0ccbd0..2c47afc22d24 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mfd/cs5535-mfd.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mfd/cs5535-mfd.c
> > > @@ -127,10 +127,11 @@ static int cs5535_mfd_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > > cs5535_mfd_cells[i].id = 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - err = mfd_add_devices(&pdev->dev, -1, cs5535_mfd_cells,
> > > + err = mfd_add_devices(&pdev->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE, cs5535_mfd_cells,
> > > ARRAY_SIZE(cs5535_mfd_cells), NULL, 0, NULL);
> > > if (err) {
> > > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "MFD add devices failed: %d\n", err);
> > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> > > + "Failed to add CS5532 sub-devices: %d\n", err);
> >
> > ^^^
> >
> > Typo (and MODULE_DESCRIPTION() says this is a driver for CS5536 too).
> > Once that is fixed:
> > Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
>
> Ta.
Looks like this comes from the failed message from the
mfd_add_devices() above. I'll fix both.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-21 11:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-21 10:58 [PATCH v2 0/9] Simplify MFD Core Lee Jones
2019-10-21 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] mfd: cs5535-mfd: Use PLATFORM_DEVID_* defines and tidy error message Lee Jones
2019-10-21 11:15 ` Daniel Thompson
2019-10-21 11:33 ` Lee Jones
2019-10-21 11:35 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2019-10-21 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] mfd: cs5535-mfd: Remove mfd_cell->id hack Lee Jones
2019-10-21 11:11 ` Daniel Thompson
2019-10-21 11:46 ` Lee Jones
2019-10-21 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] mfd: cs5535-mfd: Request shared IO regions centrally Lee Jones
2019-10-21 12:26 ` Daniel Thompson
2019-10-21 12:46 ` Lee Jones
2019-10-21 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] mfd: cs5535-mfd: Register clients using their own dedicated MFD cell entries Lee Jones
2019-10-21 12:29 ` Daniel Thompson
2019-10-21 13:21 ` Lee Jones
2019-10-21 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] mfd: mfd-core: Remove mfd_clone_cell() Lee Jones
2019-10-21 12:29 ` Daniel Thompson
2019-10-21 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] x86: olpc: Remove invocation of MFD's .enable()/.disable() call-backs Lee Jones
2019-10-21 12:17 ` Daniel Thompson
2019-10-21 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] mfd: mfd-core: Protect against NULL call-back function pointer Lee Jones
2019-10-21 12:30 ` Daniel Thompson
2019-10-21 12:32 ` Daniel Thompson
2019-10-21 12:40 ` Lee Jones
2019-10-21 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] mfd: mfd-core: Remove usage counting for .{en,dis}able() call-backs Lee Jones
2019-10-21 12:33 ` Daniel Thompson
2019-10-21 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] mfd: mfd-core: Move pdev->mfd_cell creation back into mfd_add_device() Lee Jones
2019-10-21 12:45 ` Daniel Thompson
2019-10-21 11:29 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] Simplify MFD Core Arnd Bergmann
2019-10-21 11:39 ` Lee Jones
2019-10-21 11:44 ` Lubomir Rintel
2019-10-21 11:53 ` Lee Jones
2019-10-21 12:21 ` Lubomir Rintel
2019-10-21 13:01 ` Lee Jones
2019-11-01 9:07 ` Lee Jones
2019-11-01 15:01 ` Lubomir Rintel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191021113529.GB4365@dell \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephan@gerhold.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox