public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Cc: arnd@arndb.de, broonie@kernel.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, baohua@kernel.org,
	stephan@gerhold.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] mfd: cs5535-mfd: Use PLATFORM_DEVID_* defines and tidy error message
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 12:35:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191021113529.GB4365@dell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191021113316.GA4365@dell>

On Mon, 21 Oct 2019, Lee Jones wrote:

> On Mon, 21 Oct 2019, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 11:58:14AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > In most contexts '-1' doesn't really mean much to the casual observer.
> > > In almost all cases, it's better to use a human readable define.  In
> > > this case PLATFORM_DEVID_* defines have already been provided for this
> > > purpose.
> > > 
> > > While we're here, let's be specific about the 'MFD devices' which
> > > failed.  It will help when trying to distinguish which of the 2 sets
> > > of sub-devices we actually failed to register.
> > 
> > No objections... but won't the tag added by dev_err() already
> > disambiguate?
> 
> The difference will be between CS5532 and  CS5532 OLPC.
> 
> Please see patch 4 in the series.
> 
> > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/mfd/cs5535-mfd.c | 5 +++--
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/cs5535-mfd.c b/drivers/mfd/cs5535-mfd.c
> > > index f1825c0ccbd0..2c47afc22d24 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mfd/cs5535-mfd.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mfd/cs5535-mfd.c
> > > @@ -127,10 +127,11 @@ static int cs5535_mfd_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > >  		cs5535_mfd_cells[i].id = 0;
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > > -	err = mfd_add_devices(&pdev->dev, -1, cs5535_mfd_cells,
> > > +	err = mfd_add_devices(&pdev->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE, cs5535_mfd_cells,
> > >  			      ARRAY_SIZE(cs5535_mfd_cells), NULL, 0, NULL);
> > >  	if (err) {
> > > -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "MFD add devices failed: %d\n", err);
> > > +		dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> > > +			"Failed to add CS5532 sub-devices: %d\n", err);
> > 
> >                                            ^^^
> > 
> > Typo (and MODULE_DESCRIPTION() says this is a driver for CS5536 too).
> > Once that is fixed:
> > Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
> 
> Ta.

Looks like this comes from the failed message from the
mfd_add_devices() above.  I'll fix both.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-21 11:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-21 10:58 [PATCH v2 0/9] Simplify MFD Core Lee Jones
2019-10-21 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] mfd: cs5535-mfd: Use PLATFORM_DEVID_* defines and tidy error message Lee Jones
2019-10-21 11:15   ` Daniel Thompson
2019-10-21 11:33     ` Lee Jones
2019-10-21 11:35       ` Lee Jones [this message]
2019-10-21 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] mfd: cs5535-mfd: Remove mfd_cell->id hack Lee Jones
2019-10-21 11:11   ` Daniel Thompson
2019-10-21 11:46     ` Lee Jones
2019-10-21 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] mfd: cs5535-mfd: Request shared IO regions centrally Lee Jones
2019-10-21 12:26   ` Daniel Thompson
2019-10-21 12:46     ` Lee Jones
2019-10-21 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] mfd: cs5535-mfd: Register clients using their own dedicated MFD cell entries Lee Jones
2019-10-21 12:29   ` Daniel Thompson
2019-10-21 13:21     ` Lee Jones
2019-10-21 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] mfd: mfd-core: Remove mfd_clone_cell() Lee Jones
2019-10-21 12:29   ` Daniel Thompson
2019-10-21 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] x86: olpc: Remove invocation of MFD's .enable()/.disable() call-backs Lee Jones
2019-10-21 12:17   ` Daniel Thompson
2019-10-21 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] mfd: mfd-core: Protect against NULL call-back function pointer Lee Jones
2019-10-21 12:30   ` Daniel Thompson
2019-10-21 12:32   ` Daniel Thompson
2019-10-21 12:40     ` Lee Jones
2019-10-21 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] mfd: mfd-core: Remove usage counting for .{en,dis}able() call-backs Lee Jones
2019-10-21 12:33   ` Daniel Thompson
2019-10-21 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] mfd: mfd-core: Move pdev->mfd_cell creation back into mfd_add_device() Lee Jones
2019-10-21 12:45   ` Daniel Thompson
2019-10-21 11:29 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] Simplify MFD Core Arnd Bergmann
2019-10-21 11:39   ` Lee Jones
2019-10-21 11:44   ` Lubomir Rintel
2019-10-21 11:53     ` Lee Jones
2019-10-21 12:21       ` Lubomir Rintel
2019-10-21 13:01         ` Lee Jones
2019-11-01  9:07         ` Lee Jones
2019-11-01 15:01           ` Lubomir Rintel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191021113529.GB4365@dell \
    --to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stephan@gerhold.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox