From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Divya Indi <divya.indi@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joe Jin <joe.jin@oracle.com>,
Srinivas Eeda <srinivas.eeda@oracle.com>,
Aruna Ramakrishna <aruna.ramakrishna@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] tracing: Handle the trace array ref counter in new functions
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 22:52:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191022225253.4086195c@oasis.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4cad186e-ba8b-8e1a-731b-4350a095ba5a@oracle.com>
On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 16:42:02 -0700
Divya Indi <divya.indi@oracle.com> wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> Thanks again for taking the time to review and providing feedback. Please find my comments inline.
>
> On 10/15/19 4:04 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > Sorry for taking so long to getting to these patches.
> >
> > On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 10:55:26 -0700
> > Divya Indi <divya.indi@oracle.com> wrote:
> >
> >> For functions returning a trace array Eg: trace_array_create(), we need to
> >> increment the reference counter associated with the trace array to ensure it
> >> does not get freed when in use.
> >>
> >> Once we are done using the trace array, we need to call
> >> trace_array_put() to make sure we are not holding a reference to it
> >> anymore and the instance/trace array can be removed when required.
> > I think it would be more in line with other parts of the kernel if we
> > don't need to do the trace_array_put() before calling
> > trace_array_destroy().
>
> The reason we went with this approach is
>
> instance_mkdir - ref_ctr = 0 // Does not return a trace array ptr.
> trace_array_create - ref_ctr = 1 // Since this returns a trace array ptr.
> trace_array_lookup - ref_ctr = 1 // Since this returns a trace array ptr.
>
> if we make trace_array_destroy to expect ref_ctr to be 1, we risk destroying the trace array while in use.
>
> We could make it -
>
> instance_mkdir - ref_ctr = 1
> trace_array_create - ref_ctr = 2
> trace_array_lookup - ref_ctr = 2+ // depending on no of lookups
>
> but, we'd still need the trace_array_put() (?)
>
> We can also have one function doing create (if does not exist) or lookup (if exists), but that would require
> some redundant code since instance_mkdir needs to return -EXIST when a trace array already exists.
>
> Let me know your thoughts on this.
>
Can't we just move the trace_array_put() in the instance_rmdir()?
static int instance_rmdir(const char *name)
{
struct trace_array *tr;
int ret;
mutex_lock(&event_mutex);
mutex_lock(&trace_types_lock);
ret = -ENODEV;
list_for_each_entry(tr, &ftrace_trace_arrays, list) {
if (tr->name && strcmp(tr->name, name) == 0) {
__trace_array_put(tr);
ret = __remove_instance(tr);
if (ret)
tr->ref++;
break;
}
}
mutex_unlock(&trace_types_lock);
mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);
return ret;
}
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-23 2:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-14 17:55 [PATCH 0/5 v4]Kernel Access to Ftrace instances Divya Indi
2019-08-14 17:55 ` [PATCH 1/5] tracing: Declare newly exported APIs in include/linux/trace.h Divya Indi
2019-08-14 17:55 ` [PATCH 2/5] tracing: Verify if trace array exists before destroying it Divya Indi
2019-08-14 18:42 ` Aruna Ramakrishna
2019-08-14 17:55 ` [PATCH 3/5] tracing: Adding NULL checks Divya Indi
2019-08-14 17:55 ` [PATCH 4/5] tracing: Handle the trace array ref counter in new functions Divya Indi
2019-10-15 23:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-10-16 23:42 ` Divya Indi
2019-10-23 2:52 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2019-10-23 22:57 ` Divya Indi
2019-10-24 13:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-10-24 21:31 ` Divya Indi
2019-08-14 17:55 ` [PATCH 5/5] tracing: New functions for kernel access to Ftrace instances Divya Indi
2019-10-15 23:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-10-16 23:53 ` Divya Indi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191022225253.4086195c@oasis.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=aruna.ramakrishna@oracle.com \
--cc=divya.indi@oracle.com \
--cc=joe.jin@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=srinivas.eeda@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox