From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0A33CA9EAF for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 15:10:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF86020873 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 15:10:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727083AbfJ0PJk (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Oct 2019 11:09:40 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:58424 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726682AbfJ0PJk (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Oct 2019 11:09:40 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id D8ED668B05; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 16:09:37 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2019 16:09:37 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Logan Gunthorpe Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Christoph Hellwig , Sagi Grimberg , Keith Busch , Chaitanya Kulkarni , Max Gurtovoy , Stephen Bates Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] nvme: Introduce nvme_execute_passthru_rq_nowait() Message-ID: <20191027150937.GC5843@lst.de> References: <20191025202535.12036-1-logang@deltatee.com> <20191025202535.12036-4-logang@deltatee.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191025202535.12036-4-logang@deltatee.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 02:25:35PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote: > This function is similar to nvme_execute_passthru_rq() but does > not wait and will call a callback when the request is complete. > > The new function can also be called in interrupt context, so if there > are side effects, the request will be executed in a work queue to > avoid sleeping. Why would you ever call it from interrupt context? All the target submission handlers should run in process context. > +void nvme_execute_passthru_rq_nowait(struct request *rq, rq_end_io_fn *done) > +{ > + struct nvme_command *cmd = nvme_req(rq)->cmd; > + struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl = nvme_req(rq)->ctrl; > + struct nvme_ns *ns = rq->q->queuedata; > + struct gendisk *disk = ns ? ns->disk : NULL; > + u32 effects; > + > + /* > + * This function may be called in interrupt context, so we cannot sleep > + * but nvme_passthru_[start|end]() may sleep so we need to execute > + * the command in a work queue. > + */ > + effects = nvme_command_effects(ctrl, ns, cmd->common.opcode); > + if (effects) { > + rq->end_io = done; > + INIT_WORK(&nvme_req(rq)->work, nvme_execute_passthru_rq_work); > + queue_work(nvme_wq, &nvme_req(rq)->work); But independent of the target code - I'd much rather leave this to the caller. Just call nvme_command_effects in the target code, then if there are not side effects use blk_execute_rq_nowait directly, else schedule a workqueue in the target code and call nvme_execute_passthru_rq from it.