From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 797A0CA9EB0 for ; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 12:35:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 485D02080F for ; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 12:35:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1572784544; bh=BK+D11+cHY70edHKin0so2otIas8a6H8FGw7tK2gm0A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=L9qnaHx5BD1X9+HmKFB1Nuh4b0ZKaEfOvHS+kHzRrqNP2Jo4u6h4QkSfkvbQIpps2 AkqBmvBJuVkgDeZ46JXiYq5FRlh5Ip69rnoHloJPnyt0viTnF2Sh5fp8OQESd5E+hu qic8MT7Xzdwa8WPiN8ASmAyTDTuOYkFNJahdmB4I= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727688AbfKCMfn (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Nov 2019 07:35:43 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:51302 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727377AbfKCMfm (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Nov 2019 07:35:42 -0500 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6FD1D2080F; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 12:35:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1572784540; bh=BK+D11+cHY70edHKin0so2otIas8a6H8FGw7tK2gm0A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=I1yyuyK5TLDhI39cGDdu78riruurLy+CQ/IxmIXX2JVPEI3xSJZBLG4f8bu/lFF89 KHBPHm4NjHnkVqDvJ0Nswc2NfEvrBTe/cZZPHNWg+V9HX0J2N/28IEVVQ363/qUkvo R7sLDqJ0FA4In7icqVPgIlmHFlm3c7nRzrTkNqGc= Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2019 13:35:38 +0100 From: Greg KH To: rama Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nishadkamdar@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] FBTFT: fb_sh: Changed udelay() to usleep_range() based on the Document, Documentation/timers/timers-howto.rst Excerpt from the document: -SLEEPING FOR ~USECS OR SMALL MSECS ( 10us - 20ms): * Use usleep_range Message-ID: <20191103123538.GA604630@kroah.com> References: <20191103005906.17112-1-ramakumar.kanasundara@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191103005906.17112-1-ramakumar.kanasundara@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 at 07:59:06PM -0500, rama wrote: > --- > drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_agm1264k-fl.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Hi, This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux kernel tree. You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s) as indicated below: - Your patch does not have a Signed-off-by: line. Please read the kernel file, Documentation/SubmittingPatches and resend it after adding that line. Note, the line needs to be in the body of the email, before the patch, not at the bottom of the patch or in the email signature. - You did not specify a description of why the patch is needed, or possibly, any description at all, in the email body. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/SubmittingPatches for what is needed in order to properly describe the change. - You did not write a descriptive Subject: for the patch, allowing Greg, and everyone else, to know what this patch is all about. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/SubmittingPatches for what a proper Subject: line should look like. - It looks like you did not use your "real" name for the patch on either the Signed-off-by: line, or the From: line (both of which have to match). Please read the kernel file, Documentation/SubmittingPatches for how to do this correctly. If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received from other developers. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot