From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@gmail.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] x86/mm/KASLR: Adjust the padding size for the direct mapping.
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 08:48:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191104004825.GK7616@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191102010911.21460-5-msys.mizuma@gmail.com>
On 11/01/19 at 09:09pm, Masayoshi Mizuma wrote:
> ---
> arch/x86/mm/kaslr.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/kaslr.c b/arch/x86/mm/kaslr.c
> index dc6182eec..a80eed563 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/kaslr.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/kaslr.c
> @@ -70,15 +70,60 @@ static inline bool kaslr_memory_enabled(void)
> return kaslr_enabled() && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Even though a huge virtual address space is reserved for the direct
> + * mapping of physical memory, e.g in 4-level paging mode, it's 64TB,
> + * rare system can own enough physical memory to use it up, most are
> + * even less than 1TB. So with KASLR enabled, we adapt the size of
> + * direct mapping area to the size of actual physical memory plus the
> + * configured padding CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_MEMORY_PHYSICAL_PADDING.
> + * The left part will be taken out to join memory randomization.
> + */
> +static inline unsigned long calc_direct_mapping_size(void)
> +{
> + unsigned long padding = CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_MEMORY_PHYSICAL_PADDING;
> + unsigned long size_tb, memory_tb;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
> + unsigned long actual, maximum, base;
> +
> + if (boot_params.max_addr) {
> + /*
> + * The padding size should set to get for kaslr_regions[].base
> + * bigger address than the maximum memory address the system can
> + * have. kaslr_regions[].base points "actual size + padding" or
> + * higher address. If "actual size + padding" points the lower
> + * address than the maximum memory size, fix the padding size.
> + */
> + actual = roundup(PFN_PHYS(max_pfn), 1UL << TB_SHIFT);
> + maximum = roundup(boot_params.max_addr, 1UL << TB_SHIFT);
> + base = actual + (padding << TB_SHIFT);
> +
> + if (maximum > base)
> + padding = (maximum - actual) >> TB_SHIFT;
> + }
> +#endif
> + memory_tb = DIV_ROUND_UP(max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, 1UL << TB_SHIFT) +
> + padding;
Yes, wrapping up the whole adjusting code block for the direct mapping
area into a function looks much better. This was also suggested by Ingo
when I posted UV system issue fix before, just later the UV system issue
is not seen in the current code.
However, I have a small concern about the memory_tb calculateion here.
We can treat the (actual RAM + CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_MEMORY_PHYSICAL_PADDING)
as the default memory_tb, then check if we need adjst it according to
boot_params.max_addr. Discarding the local padding variable can make
code much simpler? And it is a little confusing when mix with the
later padding concept when doing randomization, I mean the get_padding()
thing.
memory_tb = DIV_ROUND_UP(max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, 1UL << TB_SHIFT) +
CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_MEMORY_PHYSICAL_PADDING;
if (boot_params.max_addr) {
maximum = roundup(boot_params.max_addr, 1UL << TB_SHIFT);
if (maximum > memory_tb)
memory_tb = maximum;
}
#endif
Personal opinion. Anyway, this patch looks good to me. Thanks.
Thanks
Baoquan
> +
> + size_tb = 1 << (MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS - TB_SHIFT);
> +
> + /*
> + * Adapt physical memory region size based on available memory
> + */
> + if (memory_tb < size_tb)
> + size_tb = memory_tb;
> +
> + return size_tb;
> +}
> +
> /* Initialize base and padding for each memory region randomized with KASLR */
> void __init kernel_randomize_memory(void)
> {
> - size_t i;
> - unsigned long vaddr_start, vaddr;
> - unsigned long rand, memory_tb;
> - struct rnd_state rand_state;
> + unsigned long vaddr_start, vaddr, rand;
> unsigned long remain_entropy;
> unsigned long vmemmap_size;
> + struct rnd_state rand_state;
> + size_t i;
>
> vaddr_start = pgtable_l5_enabled() ? __PAGE_OFFSET_BASE_L5 : __PAGE_OFFSET_BASE_L4;
> vaddr = vaddr_start;
> @@ -95,20 +140,10 @@ void __init kernel_randomize_memory(void)
> if (!kaslr_memory_enabled())
> return;
>
> - kaslr_regions[0].size_tb = 1 << (MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS - TB_SHIFT);
> + kaslr_regions[0].size_tb = calc_direct_mapping_size();
> kaslr_regions[1].size_tb = VMALLOC_SIZE_TB;
>
> - /*
> - * Update Physical memory mapping to available and
> - * add padding if needed (especially for memory hotplug support).
> - */
> BUG_ON(kaslr_regions[0].base != &page_offset_base);
> - memory_tb = DIV_ROUND_UP(max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, 1UL << TB_SHIFT) +
> - CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_MEMORY_PHYSICAL_PADDING;
> -
> - /* Adapt phyiscal memory region size based on available memory */
> - if (memory_tb < kaslr_regions[0].size_tb)
> - kaslr_regions[0].size_tb = memory_tb;
>
> /*
> * Calculate the vmemmap region size in TBs, aligned to a TB
> --
> 2.20.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-04 0:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-02 1:09 [PATCH v4 0/4] Adjust the padding size for KASLR Masayoshi Mizuma
2019-11-02 1:09 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] x86/boot: Wrap up the SRAT traversing code into subtable_parse() Masayoshi Mizuma
2019-11-02 1:09 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] x86/boot: Add max_addr field in struct boot_params Masayoshi Mizuma
2019-11-02 1:09 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] x86/boot: Get the max address from SRAT Masayoshi Mizuma
2019-11-04 0:33 ` Baoquan He
2019-11-02 1:09 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] x86/mm/KASLR: Adjust the padding size for the direct mapping Masayoshi Mizuma
2019-11-04 0:48 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2019-11-12 20:47 ` Masayoshi Mizuma
2019-11-14 8:16 ` Baoquan He
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191104004825.GK7616@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=msys.mizuma@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox