Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-tfp410: switch to using fwnode_gpiod_get_index()

Daniel Vetter
2019-11-13T17:26:02Z

On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 02:52:23PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 4:41 PM Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 4:29 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 1:40 AM Dmitry Torokhov
> > > <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > I'm happy to merge it into the GPIO tree if some DRM maintainer can
> > > provide an ACK.
> >
> > Ack.
>
> Thanks!
>
> > > Getting ACK from DRM people is problematic and a bit of friction in the
> > > community, DVetter usually advice to seek mutual reviews etc, but IMO
> > > it would be better if some people felt more compelled to review stuff
> > > eventually. (And that has the problem that it doesn't scale.)
> >
> > This has a review already plus if you merge your implied review.
>
> Yeah I missed Laurent's review tag. I needed some kund of consent
> to take it into the GPIO tree I suppose.
>
> > That's more than good enough imo, so not seeing the issue here?
>
> No issue.
>
> What freaked me out was the option of having to pull in an
> immutable branch from my GPIO tree into drm-misc. That would
> have been scary. Keeping it all in my tree works fine.

For next time around, just ping one of the drm-misc (or drm maintainers)
for an ack to merge it through a different tree. Or ask them what they
want to do. committer model isn't 100% free-wheeling, for cross-tree stuff
you still have maintainers who're supposed to do their jobs :-)

But by default everyone will assume you'll just commit, so you need to
poke them explicitly (like you've done here).
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation