From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF21DC5DF60 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 07:43:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B01A52178F for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 07:43:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="AqCytg1X" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729907AbfKHHnA (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Nov 2019 02:43:00 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f68.google.com ([209.85.221.68]:34407 "EHLO mail-wr1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726672AbfKHHnA (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Nov 2019 02:43:00 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f68.google.com with SMTP id e6so5912605wrw.1 for ; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 23:42:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=gNQtn7/uUN2ljx3dU/Odyrx4tv892gHBGI+Z3nZ9LAE=; b=AqCytg1X3jPH8kgfye9A9jb26I9SMoTFC+22F5Z1CyA3qarF0mZnlSuzvwb0qbQMNh p6nUXeqy2SAXn2BqmdUMXbMHmiqCvUrIrpZV+9BEwAFJa5QR8ENkHo3gNx1jkGOK6pw2 8F2O4VDu/fgPfLNkpj6rf3BEvsg3oesPbqlR1fuqYEkCFOoP5zERf3x3qQErK9gFZVa+ i1q39NN4t9jYLtqzXMYKNn1z2/9NUwQ/8v4nTJJsv6iZ6c8sFEreNfdb3zB/4lwA5jPb N0ZMhXUEALlO3YIOBxbBi7yZQR8o7o7hSCufXESr+QSJ2kFKTfckgSOF1G5NDeMhDRbV ZDKQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=gNQtn7/uUN2ljx3dU/Odyrx4tv892gHBGI+Z3nZ9LAE=; b=UVlITnaHs5Xr37QDSl9/2L/xJ0jpT4qvCyVOSNonugREY2H0Z4sN7ZY32VKb9Z2vL1 I3wQH5uM85kr6l5cMvWsHlxFcQruzc7ckSnpY4ezLAAz641dVGByjol/bJ8JcnXdncBY xyfDnDY1Sm9tLoS2gjuhhZm7Wcv/HukDwQv3vKm1EGB9E5Y4d4iCAyZt+YNVQNwC8mze 5G9Xzlf0ZlfJkRF3fBteZa+seKmYlZTjJX6KqRQmddMjKq2IaFZoNZJ9+fLDq7AiFXnJ lLsI0DetR6/5m0ns7AZTJb4sGgHS9PpDQWu4t0RMnGYixwUgVuOnJwTWRCLtlDx5lSMG 5R9w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUfgsGRMxUCDkcp/l8RsfxV2gKVKnxO8zcCKsRP7b31nk8F7OX/ +Jye5jYzFAOpFg6c7sJR3yG/9g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxYjGaklh3lrhXXSL51hFVk11rNwqJLwFJ6E2Q13uV91J5H5IknfpzHN6C/DoGyNbBlcr1N9g== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5306:: with SMTP id e6mr5554996wrv.187.1573198978705; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 23:42:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from dell ([95.147.198.88]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a15sm4465660wrw.10.2019.11.07.23.42.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 07 Nov 2019 23:42:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 07:42:55 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: gregkh@google.com Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yu-Hsuan Hsu , Mark Brown , Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] ASoC: max98090: remove 24-bit format support if RJ is 0 Message-ID: <20191108074255.GB18902@dell> References: <20191107201702.27023-1-lee.jones@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20191107201702.27023-1-lee.jones@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 07 Nov 2019, Lee Jones wrote: > From: Yu-Hsuan Hsu > > [ Upstream commit 5628c8979642a076f91ee86c3bae5ad251639af0 ] Please ignore this, it was not meant for public review. For some reason --suppress-cc=all broke when upgrading yesterday. Sorry for the noise. > The supported formats are S16_LE and S24_LE now. However, by datasheet > of max98090, S24_LE is only supported when it is in the right justified > mode. We should remove 24-bit format if it is not in that mode to avoid > triggering error. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Linaro Services Technical Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog