From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] perf probe: Generate event name with line number
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 11:06:25 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191111140625.GC9365@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191111140450.GB9365@kernel.org>
Em Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 11:04:50AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 01:27:58AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> > Generate event name from function name with line number
> > as <function>_L<line_number>. Note that this is only for
> > the new event which is defined by the line number of
> > function (except for line 0).
> >
> > If there is another event on same line, you have to use
> > "-f" option. In that case, the new event has "_1" suffix.
> >
> > e.g.
> > # perf probe -a kernel_read:1
> > Added new events:
> > probe:kernel_read_L1 (on kernel_read:1)
>
> While testing this, using the same function (kernel_read), I found it
> confusing that it is possible to insert probes in lines seemingly with
> no code, for instance:
>
> [root@quaco ~]# perf probe -a kernel_read:1
> Added new event:
> probe:kernel_read_L1 (on kernel_read:1)
>
> You can now use it in all perf tools, such as:
>
> perf record -e probe:kernel_read_L1 -aR sleep 1
>
> [root@quaco ~]# perf probe -a kernel_read:2
> Added new event:
> probe:kernel_read_L2 (on kernel_read:2)
>
> You can now use it in all perf tools, such as:
>
> perf record -e probe:kernel_read_L2 -aR sleep 1
>
> #
> # perf probe --list
> probe:kernel_read_l1 (on kernel_read@fs/read_write.c)
> probe:kernel_read_l2 (on kernel_read:1@fs/read_write.c)
Also look above at the listing, I would expect this instead:
# perf probe --list
probe:kernel_read_l1 (on kernel_read:1@fs/read_write.c)
probe:kernel_read_l2 (on kernel_read:2@fs/read_write.c)
Right?
- Arnaldo
> [root@quaco ~]# perf probe -L kernel_read
> <kernel_read@/usr/src/debug/kernel-5.3.fc30/linux-5.3.8-200.fc30.x86_64/fs/read_write.c:0>
> 0 ssize_t kernel_read(struct file *file, void *buf, size_t count, loff_t *pos)
> 1 {
> 2 mm_segment_t old_fs;
> 3 ssize_t result;
>
> 5 old_fs = get_fs();
> 6 set_fs(KERNEL_DS);
> /* The cast to a user pointer is valid due to the set_fs() */
> 8 result = vfs_read(file, (void __user *)buf, count, pos);
> 9 set_fs(old_fs);
> 10 return result;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(kernel_read);
>
>
> [root@quaco ~]#
>
>
> What is the point of putting a probe on line 2? I is not initializing,
> etc, 1 as well, notthing there and we already have 0 (or not specifying
> a line number) to put a probe at the start of a function, can you
> clarify?
>
> I'll apply this patch, the problem above isn't strictly related to it.
>
> - Arnaldo
--
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-11 14:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-07 16:27 [PATCH v2 0/4] perf/probe: Support multiprobe and immediates Masami Hiramatsu
2019-11-07 16:27 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] perf probe: Generate event name with line number Masami Hiramatsu
2019-11-11 14:04 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-11-11 14:06 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2019-11-11 14:07 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-11-12 10:31 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-11-13 1:01 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-11-13 12:09 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-11-14 4:14 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-11-07 16:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] perf probe: Support multiprobe event Masami Hiramatsu
2019-11-07 16:28 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] perf probe: Support DW_AT_const_value constant value Masami Hiramatsu
2019-11-07 16:28 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] perf probe: Trace a magic number if variable is not found Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191111140625.GC9365@kernel.org \
--to=arnaldo.melo@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox