From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17CBDC43215 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 17:26:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF47206E2 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 17:26:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ffwll.ch header.i=@ffwll.ch header.b="Mi9PTtkI" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727638AbfKMR0B (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Nov 2019 12:26:01 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f66.google.com ([209.85.128.66]:35389 "EHLO mail-wm1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726318AbfKMR0A (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Nov 2019 12:26:00 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f66.google.com with SMTP id 8so2949778wmo.0 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 09:25:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ffwll.ch; s=google; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Ne3IB6JUFova0lzzOpPMWzymeDbzsimAaBCz8RRdb34=; b=Mi9PTtkIzr+0PMcGE/bBm9Lq/ypoje6GERaznJxRQcp3bbriEbSsx6sIC7o41HhzLM JnyVFLZ8MEWgjYltJbjEpR3JwpHmwdgByvX668e3QjuOIIXkukRGze0uLqhswvuW8a6H JBaOuWRhOYDLvzriTO1AQpkk/7rQBBJDZ+5i0= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Ne3IB6JUFova0lzzOpPMWzymeDbzsimAaBCz8RRdb34=; b=BMPV94VpIA2KRqiQmeBCHN52tui6AdKePcsllPStbpoIZCNmJeQb3IEXRHpF5AxaGz YALU5RI4zEfHU3KrFDDbJj7PsKG0fG6+V6Lm4sOM6u/uEVVKJp3w9ViVnO6MjeK4qtbj oWxxBu35l2ogfL7588M0o3d/4RpPShpcpllx7z6AjSB/FMGHnd8NJiOGabzuUR5sGdC7 9H1FtRzqo+8/LHs+s4/4MHJK97t7kbHWIRvm3NV/5x8BRcZfB6ehrayJsZMFVQxfvLjz TbeXOvonpLI5Pyo7QMXgF0YL9cW6otTbGGivCX3gPsX/r1FtPYRv7/f58Wuqd3FiOFFt bL0w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV8bx74BPqoQDAOc811t20g86zIyUBtuB2tKf/hSAguIA7Ug/3Q Cp/kch7sbXSm4Ybdp71OBaDsKw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxCtvJuXqPxIA0Khu8utk9sAVQT2i2beFqWvz4cDuTR2YzISI6cdki5QgFtYGv0aIG12l7Iug== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c959:: with SMTP id i25mr3817163wml.100.1573665958483; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 09:25:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from phenom.ffwll.local (212-51-149-96.fiber7.init7.net. [212.51.149.96]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x9sm3610241wru.32.2019.11.13.09.25.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 13 Nov 2019 09:25:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 18:25:55 +0100 From: Daniel Vetter To: Linus Walleij Cc: Daniel Vetter , Dmitry Torokhov , Andrzej Hajda , Neil Armstrong , Laurent Pinchart , Jonas Karlman , Jernej Skrabec , David Airlie , Heikki Krogerus , "open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-tfp410: switch to using fwnode_gpiod_get_index() Message-ID: <20191113172555.GW23790@phenom.ffwll.local> Mail-Followup-To: Linus Walleij , Dmitry Torokhov , Andrzej Hajda , Neil Armstrong , Laurent Pinchart , Jonas Karlman , Jernej Skrabec , David Airlie , Heikki Krogerus , "open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" References: <20191014184320.GA161094@dtor-ws> <20191105004050.GU57214@dtor-ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: Linux phenom 5.2.0-3-amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 02:52:23PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 4:41 PM Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 4:29 PM Linus Walleij wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 1:40 AM Dmitry Torokhov > > > wrote: > > > > I'm happy to merge it into the GPIO tree if some DRM maintainer can > > > provide an ACK. > > > > Ack. > > Thanks! > > > > Getting ACK from DRM people is problematic and a bit of friction in the > > > community, DVetter usually advice to seek mutual reviews etc, but IMO > > > it would be better if some people felt more compelled to review stuff > > > eventually. (And that has the problem that it doesn't scale.) > > > > This has a review already plus if you merge your implied review. > > Yeah I missed Laurent's review tag. I needed some kund of consent > to take it into the GPIO tree I suppose. > > > That's more than good enough imo, so not seeing the issue here? > > No issue. > > What freaked me out was the option of having to pull in an > immutable branch from my GPIO tree into drm-misc. That would > have been scary. Keeping it all in my tree works fine. For next time around, just ping one of the drm-misc (or drm maintainers) for an ack to merge it through a different tree. Or ask them what they want to do. committer model isn't 100% free-wheeling, for cross-tree stuff you still have maintainers who're supposed to do their jobs :-) But by default everyone will assume you'll just commit, so you need to poke them explicitly (like you've done here). -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch