[PATCH] regulator: rn5t618: fix rc5t619 ldo10 enable

Andreas Kemnade
2019-11-13T18:27:01Z

LDO9 and LDO10 were listed with the same enable bits.
That looks insane and there are no provisions in the code for handling such
a special case. Also other out-of-tree drivers use a separate bit to
enable it.
Example:
https://github.com/brunotl/kernel-kobo-mx6sl-ntx/blob/master/drivers/regulator/ricoh619-regulator.c
So it seems to be clearly a bug.
I cannot fully check it on my board without schematics and just discovered
this during code analysis for another problem.

Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>
---
drivers/regulator/rn5t618-regulator.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/rn5t618-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/rn5t618-regulator.c
index eb807a059479..4a91be0ad5ae 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/rn5t618-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/rn5t618-regulator.c
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ static const struct regulator_desc rc5t619_regulators[] = {
REG(LDO7, LDOEN1, BIT(6), LDO7DAC, 0x7f, 900000, 3500000, 25000),
REG(LDO8, LDOEN1, BIT(7), LDO8DAC, 0x7f, 900000, 3500000, 25000),
REG(LDO9, LDOEN2, BIT(0), LDO9DAC, 0x7f, 900000, 3500000, 25000),
- REG(LDO10, LDOEN2, BIT(0), LDO10DAC, 0x7f, 900000, 3500000, 25000),
+ REG(LDO10, LDOEN2, BIT(1), LDO10DAC, 0x7f, 900000, 3500000, 25000),
/* LDO RTC */
REG(LDORTC1, LDOEN2, BIT(4), LDORTCDAC, 0x7f, 1700000, 3500000, 25000),
REG(LDORTC2, LDOEN2, BIT(5), LDORTC2DAC, 0x7f, 900000, 3500000, 25000),
--
2.20.1