From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5811AC432C3 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 19:08:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3297420718 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 19:08:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1573758530; bh=qoJvmm3HUBhrO4GtlbT8E1muqZuJdtDDlNo4ymu6dRg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=NyEKmgL5xZJBj72ulAEqRMVaKp4jcK5KJNhjMVPRhbaxFDWWgq3p5oKgyxfZjtJnc goOGU6a7wfQtGOhrIKPLp7kP7/NZNdmi8+mHnB8G8R9fGclsq0a1RNYzkC7DqGJj2G pMp5yShX/oSbzweJS1FffKrSlRdg+W1/3SqQpKe0= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726960AbfKNTIt (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Nov 2019 14:08:49 -0500 Received: from heliosphere.sirena.org.uk ([172.104.155.198]:41988 "EHLO heliosphere.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726444AbfKNTIs (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Nov 2019 14:08:48 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sirena.org.uk; s=20170815-heliosphere; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=kexbIRGdgnOvNpDCJNRhDSzcKw+JRewZujyNvN5WeHE=; b=vkE2lkRgfNiR5JBodUL9yjrTh xUawzxKzxyWEg1tP0OB4VmcSGeX4UPteei3IrJrGluGdM6cpGEjbasV7pmaunhFnO7qfYBkZSeJ6t ElCcgYSeNn1ERx3dfJ+aCdlTZ3tuolw2zDiTwh09a3+o2slFVcDsgO7ZBc4LxQlUrpfrY=; Received: from cpc102320-sgyl38-2-0-cust46.18-2.cable.virginm.net ([82.37.168.47] helo=ypsilon.sirena.org.uk) by heliosphere.sirena.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iVKU0-0007PQ-Lc; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 19:08:44 +0000 Received: by ypsilon.sirena.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B96AF274328B; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 19:08:43 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 19:08:43 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Andreas Kemnade Cc: lgirdwood@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, phh@phh.me, b.galvani@gmail.com, stefan@agner.ch Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: rn5t618: fix rc5t619 ldo10 enable Message-ID: <20191114190843.GB4664@sirena.co.uk> References: <20191113182643.23885-1-andreas@kemnade.info> <20191113183211.GB4402@sirena.co.uk> <20191113202633.66a91d96@aktux> <20191114115430.GA4664@sirena.co.uk> <20191114152451.1756b0c8@kemnade.info> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Pd0ReVV5GZGQvF3a" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191114152451.1756b0c8@kemnade.info> X-Cookie: Santa Claus is watching! User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Pd0ReVV5GZGQvF3a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 03:24:51PM +0100, Andreas Kemnade wrote: > Mark Brown wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 08:26:33PM +0100, Andreas Kemnade wrote: > > > Well, it is not just guessing, it is there in the url I referenced. B= ut > > > I would of course prefer a better source. At first I wanted to spread > > > my findings. =20 > > The URL you provided looked to be for a different part though? > No, they just skip the rc5t in the name. Same situation in the vendor > kernel for my device, but there is only a tarball online, so it is bad > to reference. Everything is named there ricoh619 (or 61x). And on the chi= p is > printed rc5t619. Ah, OK - that's probably good enough then. Let's leave it a bit and see if we can get some more definite review though. --Pd0ReVV5GZGQvF3a Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl3NpjoACgkQJNaLcl1U h9Dlxwf7BXGuuBwTLLz94MrZ1bDq60w+rMhV89xgvzQsVWZO8iGtBOE8LQkzWVfi xrR5ELowY3l1YXlimjIDTOqCxIzBB2Z3Gi4tffBk9TbVS0vL9FNu+WyYZcS21IEL Ubk8YVLbdnHGRVehtN77tktwwXccO+oN5Tt5Mb2h492aG+pAKeRR7exaJzXMvuRn wWb7n6d5PCkcY6Dv6Xs5HbPDt4/KJfidshrnKsMGxSHeck4RencXKM5L5dNdtD2X jt+u1q1BoECOqmeG0YfHL8s1T27lePZrbh0ojEO4jbW41XfSXLyL319QjGBDBclA 1DkH82nbWe9fDS0B83y5SVYikDszvA== =J4fs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Pd0ReVV5GZGQvF3a--