From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: virtio-fs@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: vgoyal@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, dgilbert@redhat.com,
miklos@szeredi.hu
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] virtiofs: Provide a helper function for virtqueue initialization
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 15:57:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191115205705.2046-2-vgoyal@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191115205705.2046-1-vgoyal@redhat.com>
This reduces code duplication and make it little easier to read code.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
---
fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
index b5ba83ef1914..a0fb0a93980c 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ enum {
VQ_REQUEST
};
+#define VQ_NAME_LEN 24
+
/* Per-virtqueue state */
struct virtio_fs_vq {
spinlock_t lock;
@@ -36,7 +38,7 @@ struct virtio_fs_vq {
bool connected;
long in_flight;
struct completion in_flight_zero; /* No inflight requests */
- char name[24];
+ char name[VQ_NAME_LEN];
} ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
/* A virtio-fs device instance */
@@ -560,6 +562,26 @@ static void virtio_fs_vq_done(struct virtqueue *vq)
schedule_work(&fsvq->done_work);
}
+static void virtio_fs_init_vq(struct virtio_fs_vq *fsvq, char *name,
+ int vq_type)
+{
+ strncpy(fsvq->name, name, VQ_NAME_LEN);
+ spin_lock_init(&fsvq->lock);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fsvq->queued_reqs);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fsvq->end_reqs);
+ init_completion(&fsvq->in_flight_zero);
+
+ if (vq_type == VQ_REQUEST) {
+ INIT_WORK(&fsvq->done_work, virtio_fs_requests_done_work);
+ INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&fsvq->dispatch_work,
+ virtio_fs_request_dispatch_work);
+ } else {
+ INIT_WORK(&fsvq->done_work, virtio_fs_hiprio_done_work);
+ INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&fsvq->dispatch_work,
+ virtio_fs_hiprio_dispatch_work);
+ }
+}
+
/* Initialize virtqueues */
static int virtio_fs_setup_vqs(struct virtio_device *vdev,
struct virtio_fs *fs)
@@ -575,7 +597,7 @@ static int virtio_fs_setup_vqs(struct virtio_device *vdev,
if (fs->num_request_queues == 0)
return -EINVAL;
- fs->nvqs = 1 + fs->num_request_queues;
+ fs->nvqs = VQ_REQUEST + fs->num_request_queues;
fs->vqs = kcalloc(fs->nvqs, sizeof(fs->vqs[VQ_HIPRIO]), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!fs->vqs)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -589,29 +611,17 @@ static int virtio_fs_setup_vqs(struct virtio_device *vdev,
goto out;
}
+ /* Initialize the hiprio/forget request virtqueue */
callbacks[VQ_HIPRIO] = virtio_fs_vq_done;
- snprintf(fs->vqs[VQ_HIPRIO].name, sizeof(fs->vqs[VQ_HIPRIO].name),
- "hiprio");
+ virtio_fs_init_vq(&fs->vqs[VQ_HIPRIO], "hiprio", VQ_HIPRIO);
names[VQ_HIPRIO] = fs->vqs[VQ_HIPRIO].name;
- INIT_WORK(&fs->vqs[VQ_HIPRIO].done_work, virtio_fs_hiprio_done_work);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fs->vqs[VQ_HIPRIO].queued_reqs);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fs->vqs[VQ_HIPRIO].end_reqs);
- INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&fs->vqs[VQ_HIPRIO].dispatch_work,
- virtio_fs_hiprio_dispatch_work);
- init_completion(&fs->vqs[VQ_HIPRIO].in_flight_zero);
- spin_lock_init(&fs->vqs[VQ_HIPRIO].lock);
/* Initialize the requests virtqueues */
for (i = VQ_REQUEST; i < fs->nvqs; i++) {
- spin_lock_init(&fs->vqs[i].lock);
- INIT_WORK(&fs->vqs[i].done_work, virtio_fs_requests_done_work);
- INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&fs->vqs[i].dispatch_work,
- virtio_fs_request_dispatch_work);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fs->vqs[i].queued_reqs);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fs->vqs[i].end_reqs);
- init_completion(&fs->vqs[i].in_flight_zero);
- snprintf(fs->vqs[i].name, sizeof(fs->vqs[i].name),
- "requests.%u", i - VQ_REQUEST);
+ char vq_name[VQ_NAME_LEN];
+
+ snprintf(vq_name, VQ_NAME_LEN, "requests.%u", i - VQ_REQUEST);
+ virtio_fs_init_vq(&fs->vqs[i], vq_name, VQ_REQUEST);
callbacks[i] = virtio_fs_vq_done;
names[i] = fs->vqs[i].name;
}
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-15 20:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-15 20:57 [PATCH 0/4] [RFC] virtiofs: Add a notification queue Vivek Goyal
2019-11-15 20:57 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2019-11-15 20:57 ` [PATCH 2/4] virtiofs: Add an index to keep track of first request queue Vivek Goyal
2019-11-21 16:00 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-11-21 16:00 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-11-15 20:57 ` [PATCH 3/4] virtiofs: Add a virtqueue for notifications Vivek Goyal
2019-11-15 20:57 ` [PATCH 4/4] virtiofs: Support blocking posix locks (fcntl(F_SETLKW)) Vivek Goyal
2019-11-21 17:00 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-11-22 13:00 ` Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191115205705.2046-2-vgoyal@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtio-fs@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox