From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF761C432C0 for ; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 07:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8129D2075C for ; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 07:14:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1573974887; bh=x0TTfEx8G9wpLcyr2LJaN4x/iCxAjQEPMWQAh24eTIw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=xy6gsutfnVqbbjk9Z1ydB/Vlmeh6XlbSFyB5GPotaNhBupHpyNXgIX/cqAJUTKMbr jgocBVIcVTZB0Z4N7WSnVUFLaZlbw1C5GEWLKp2abbxjihp3bDJFk+a2L2iQZMv7uZ O5ausU89OZR7SlCnRbK1DMyoRXOtG9gM9VNnEhJo= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726070AbfKQHOq (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Nov 2019 02:14:46 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:37888 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725880AbfKQHOq (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Nov 2019 02:14:46 -0500 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 22D6020740; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 07:14:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1573974885; bh=x0TTfEx8G9wpLcyr2LJaN4x/iCxAjQEPMWQAh24eTIw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=lBgXd4n0HN/3B55qLCSZPE0eyW3AZP3k3Hfek6HYPG+F81Gz1zQ8VDoEb/gDUSqfQ 3w0nbINR+gQPe9K/eLk7IdfMjbfpH6F96TMG8PSHyihiTbaRNLhgr8PGK6+6iTluHo W/ZA6Efbnuifha0mZnKQKKPASSmnu6/V6pfU6RYk= Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 08:14:42 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Ikjoon Jang Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Alan Stern , Suwan Kim , "Gustavo A . R . Silva" , Johan Hovold , Nicolas Boitchat Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] usb: override hub device bInterval with device node Message-ID: <20191117071442.GC496402@kroah.com> References: <20191117033149.259303-1-ikjn@chromium.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191117033149.259303-1-ikjn@chromium.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 11:31:49AM +0800, Ikjoon Jang wrote: > This patchset enables hard wired hub device to use different bInterval > from its descriptor when the hub has a combined device node. If it is a hard-wired hub, why can't you change that interval in the firmware for that hub as you (as a platform owner) have control over that? thanks, greg k-h