From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: Use ARM SMC Calling Convention when OP-TEE is available
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 08:30:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191119163013.GK35479@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191119162157.GJ35479@atomide.com>
* Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [191119 16:22]:
> * Andrew F. Davis <afd@ti.com> [191119 01:14]:
> > A generic smc() call would be nice, but arm_smccc_smc() is specifically
> > for SMCCC.
>
> To me it seeems that HAVE_ARM_SMCCC is a generic feature though.
> It's not limited to OPTEE. We have select HAVE_ARM_SMCCC if CPU_V7
> in arch/arm/Kconfig, and OPTEE depends on HAVE_ARM_SMCCC.
>
> From that point of view it seems that we could have HAVE_ARM_SMCCC
> enabled also for v6 and use it for all mach-omap2 with a wrapper.
In the omap_smc1 case it seems that we can just unconditionally
change the callers to use arm_smccc_smc() instead of omap_smc1
and get rid of it. It's only used by v7 SMP related stuff based
on grepping for it.
> So I'd like to have our smc callers eventually just call generic
> generic arm_smccc_smc(OMAP_SIP_SMC_STD_CALL_VAL(fn)...) rather
> than the custom calls. And we want to update to using the generic
> functions one case at a time as the features get tested :)
Sounds like the others can be then done one at a time as
needed :)
Regards,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-19 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-18 16:52 [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: Use ARM SMC Calling Convention when OP-TEE is available Andrew F. Davis
2019-11-18 21:57 ` Tony Lindgren
2019-11-18 22:13 ` Andrew F. Davis
2019-11-18 22:31 ` Tony Lindgren
2019-11-19 1:13 ` Andrew F. Davis
2019-11-19 16:21 ` Tony Lindgren
2019-11-19 16:30 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2019-11-19 16:30 ` Andrew F. Davis
2019-11-19 16:42 ` Tony Lindgren
2019-11-19 18:05 ` Tony Lindgren
2019-11-19 18:20 ` Andrew F. Davis
2019-11-19 18:32 ` Tony Lindgren
2019-11-19 18:50 ` Andrew F. Davis
2019-11-19 19:07 ` Tony Lindgren
2019-11-19 19:12 ` Andrew F. Davis
2019-11-19 19:20 ` Tony Lindgren
2019-11-19 19:35 ` Andrew F. Davis
2019-11-19 19:44 ` Tony Lindgren
2019-11-19 19:59 ` Andrew F. Davis
2019-12-16 20:56 ` Andrew F. Davis
2019-12-16 21:04 ` Tony Lindgren
2019-12-16 22:34 ` Andrew F. Davis
2019-12-16 22:41 ` Tony Lindgren
2019-12-17 13:14 ` Andrew F. Davis
2019-12-17 15:07 ` Tony Lindgren
2019-12-17 17:01 ` Andrew F. Davis
2019-12-17 17:11 ` Tony Lindgren
2019-12-17 17:18 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191119163013.GK35479@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=afd@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox