From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B61C432C0 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 06:03:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5018120674 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 06:03:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1574402633; bh=z1eVLwXiLmA33ZjS/VWvvXhkVIz7u9fA+N+baWptQ2s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=tS/L8Pc+87lisVBhfZwvu4EJY4RZFznOG18NGz4j6zgzoTB7RZ7zhPseAESzqGgJ0 gFToUATTo2Ne96vz2axw09BuCWnPikhcQl4MRBfTIMqOKo96RB41yQoI0Uu62AwCeT iwPJxh6R43RgkpWcA7qF6m9OmXdcGIG/PJFnJPqQ= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728926AbfKVGDw (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Nov 2019 01:03:52 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:41954 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729846AbfKVGDC (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Nov 2019 01:03:02 -0500 Received: from sasha-vm.mshome.net (c-73-47-72-35.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [73.47.72.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5195D2068E; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 06:03:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1574402582; bh=z1eVLwXiLmA33ZjS/VWvvXhkVIz7u9fA+N+baWptQ2s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=UPQPqpWr7IrnwskALGo/G/VWtWOsecNNfSvmP6GNv1WNBcrHPXD2qgoBNd2rxjx5i 3RbeUeyfZf6o89sVdDoATrIEVelURXb4EsnW3R0sdMidmqhfEJ+X9GSkLWyLRtJBnk JHEsmHB+0cxbDxNwct+/6gAFVfzqs1UqGjAX96Zo= From: Sasha Levin To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Eric Dumazet , "David S . Miller" , Sasha Levin , netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 83/91] net: fix possible overflow in __sk_mem_raise_allocated() Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 01:01:21 -0500 Message-Id: <20191122060129.4239-82-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20191122060129.4239-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20191122060129.4239-1-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: Ignore Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Eric Dumazet [ Upstream commit 5bf325a53202b8728cf7013b72688c46071e212e ] With many active TCP sockets, fat TCP sockets could fool __sk_mem_raise_allocated() thanks to an overflow. They would increase their share of the memory, instead of decreasing it. Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- include/net/sock.h | 2 +- net/core/sock.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h index d8d14ae8892a7..aed436567d70b 100644 --- a/include/net/sock.h +++ b/include/net/sock.h @@ -1201,7 +1201,7 @@ static inline void sk_sockets_allocated_inc(struct sock *sk) percpu_counter_inc(sk->sk_prot->sockets_allocated); } -static inline int +static inline u64 sk_sockets_allocated_read_positive(struct sock *sk) { return percpu_counter_read_positive(sk->sk_prot->sockets_allocated); diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c index d224933514074..41794a698da66 100644 --- a/net/core/sock.c +++ b/net/core/sock.c @@ -2156,7 +2156,7 @@ int __sk_mem_schedule(struct sock *sk, int size, int kind) } if (sk_has_memory_pressure(sk)) { - int alloc; + u64 alloc; if (!sk_under_memory_pressure(sk)) return 1; -- 2.20.1