From: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
To: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Michael Trimarchi <michael@amarulasolutions.com>,
linux-amarula <linux-amarula@amarulasolutions.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 4/7] drm/sun4i: dsi: Handle bus clock explicitly
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 19:18:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191122181820.GQ4345@gilmour.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMty3ZD5uxU=xb0z7PWaXzodYbWRJkP9HjGX-HZYFT4bwk0GOg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5891 bytes --]
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 05:24:47PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 3, 2019 at 11:02 PM Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 07:42:55PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > > Hi Maxime,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 2:24 PM Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 04:03:56AM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > > > > > > explicit handling of common clock would require since the A64
> > > > > > > doesn't need to mention the clock-names explicitly in dts since it
> > > > > > > support only one bus clock.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Also pass clk_id NULL instead "bus" to regmap clock init function
> > > > > > > since the single clock variants no need to mention clock-names
> > > > > > > explicitly.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You don't need explicit clock handling. Passing NULL as the argument
> > > > > > in regmap_init_mmio_clk will make it use the first clock, which is the
> > > > > > bus clock.
> > > > >
> > > > > Indeed I tried that, since NULL clk_id wouldn't enable the bus clock
> > > > > during regmap_mmio_gen_context code, passing NULL triggering vblank
> > > > > timeout.
> > > >
> > > > There's a bunch of users of NULL in tree, so finding out why NULL
> > > > doesn't work is the way forward.
> > >
> > > I'd have looked the some of the users before checking the code as
> > > well. As I said passing NULL clk_id to devm_regmap_init_mmio_clk =>
> > > __devm_regmap_init_mmio_clk would return before processing the clock.
> > >
> > > Here is the code snippet on the tree just to make sure I'm on the same
> > > page or not.
> > >
> > > static struct regmap_mmio_context *regmap_mmio_gen_context(struct device *dev,
> > > const char *clk_id,
> > > void __iomem *regs,
> > > const struct regmap_config *config)
> > > {
> > > -----------------------
> > > --------------
> > > if (clk_id == NULL)
> > > return ctx;
> > >
> > > ctx->clk = clk_get(dev, clk_id);
> > > if (IS_ERR(ctx->clk)) {
> > > ret = PTR_ERR(ctx->clk);
> > > goto err_free;
> > > }
> > >
> > > ret = clk_prepare(ctx->clk);
> > > if (ret < 0) {
> > > clk_put(ctx->clk);
> > > goto err_free;
> > > }
> > > -------------
> > > ---------------
> > > }
> > >
> > > Yes, I did check on the driver in the tree before committing explicit
> > > clock handle, which make similar requirements like us in [1]. this
> > > imx2 wdt driver is handling the explicit clock as well. I'm sure this
> > > driver is updated as I have seen few changes related to this driver in
> > > ML.
> >
> > I guess we have two ways to go at this then.
> >
> > Either we remove the return, but it might have a few side-effects, or
> > we call clk_get with NULL or bus depending on the case, and then call
> > regmap_mmio_attach_clk.
>
> Thanks for the inputs.
>
> Please have a look at this snippet, I have used your second
> suggestions. let me know if you have any comments?
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c
> index 8fa90cfc2ac8..91c95e56d870 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c
> @@ -1109,24 +1109,36 @@ static int sun6i_dsi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return PTR_ERR(dsi->regulator);
> }
>
> - dsi->regs = devm_regmap_init_mmio_clk(dev, "bus", base,
> - &sun6i_dsi_regmap_config);
> - if (IS_ERR(dsi->regs)) {
> - dev_err(dev, "Couldn't create the DSI encoder regmap\n");
> - return PTR_ERR(dsi->regs);
> - }
> -
> dsi->reset = devm_reset_control_get_shared(dev, NULL);
> if (IS_ERR(dsi->reset)) {
> dev_err(dev, "Couldn't get our reset line\n");
> return PTR_ERR(dsi->reset);
> }
>
> + dsi->regs = regmap_init_mmio(dev, base, &sun6i_dsi_regmap_config);
You should use the devm variant here
> + if (IS_ERR(dsi->regs)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Couldn't init regmap\n");
> + return PTR_ERR(dsi->regs);
> + }
> +
> + dsi->bus_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
I guess you still need to pass 'bus' here?
> + if (IS_ERR(dsi->bus_clk)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Couldn't get the DSI bus clock\n");
> + ret = PTR_ERR(dsi->bus_clk);
> + goto err_regmap;
> + } else {
> + printk("Jagan.. Got the BUS clock\n");
> + ret = regmap_mmio_attach_clk(dsi->regs, dsi->bus_clk);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_bus_clk;
> + }
> +
> if (dsi->variant->has_mod_clk) {
> dsi->mod_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "mod");
> if (IS_ERR(dsi->mod_clk)) {
> dev_err(dev, "Couldn't get the DSI mod clock\n");
> - return PTR_ERR(dsi->mod_clk);
> + ret = PTR_ERR(dsi->mod_clk);
> + goto err_attach_clk;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -1167,6 +1179,14 @@ static int sun6i_dsi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> err_unprotect_clk:
> if (dsi->variant->has_mod_clk)
> clk_rate_exclusive_put(dsi->mod_clk);
> +err_attach_clk:
> + if (!IS_ERR(dsi->bus_clk))
> + regmap_mmio_detach_clk(dsi->regs);
> +err_bus_clk:
> + if (!IS_ERR(dsi->bus_clk))
> + clk_put(dsi->bus_clk);
> +err_regmap:
> + regmap_exit(dsi->regs);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -1181,6 +1201,13 @@ static int sun6i_dsi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (dsi->variant->has_mod_clk)
> clk_rate_exclusive_put(dsi->mod_clk);
>
> + if (!IS_ERR(dsi->bus_clk)) {
> + regmap_mmio_detach_clk(dsi->regs);
> + clk_put(dsi->bus_clk);
This will trigger a warning, you put down the reference twice
Maxime
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-22 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-25 17:56 [PATCH v11 0/7] drm/sun4i: Allwinner A64 MIPI-DSI support Jagan Teki
2019-10-25 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 1/7] dt-bindings: sun6i-dsi: Document A64 MIPI-DSI controller Jagan Teki
2019-10-29 22:06 ` Rob Herring
2019-10-25 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 2/7] dt-bindings: sun6i-dsi: Add A64 DPHY compatible (w/ A31 fallback) Jagan Teki
2019-10-27 21:17 ` Rob Herring
2019-10-28 22:37 ` Jagan Teki
2019-10-25 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 3/7] drm/sun4i: dsi: Add has_mod_clk quirk Jagan Teki
2019-10-25 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 4/7] drm/sun4i: dsi: Handle bus clock explicitly Jagan Teki
2019-10-28 15:34 ` Maxime Ripard
2019-10-28 22:33 ` Jagan Teki
2019-10-29 8:54 ` Maxime Ripard
2019-11-01 14:12 ` Jagan Teki
2019-11-03 17:32 ` Maxime Ripard
2019-11-21 11:54 ` Jagan Teki
2019-11-22 18:18 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2019-11-22 19:50 ` Jagan Teki
2019-11-28 17:51 ` Maxime Ripard
2019-12-03 6:38 ` Jagan Teki
2019-10-25 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 5/7] drm/sun4i: dsi: Add Allwinner A64 MIPI DSI support Jagan Teki
2019-10-25 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 6/7] arm64: dts: allwinner: a64: Add MIPI DSI pipeline Jagan Teki
2019-10-25 17:56 ` [DO NOT MERGE] [PATCH v11 7/7] arm64: dts: allwinner: bananapi-m64: Enable Bananapi S070WV20-CT16 DSI panel Jagan Teki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191122181820.GQ4345@gilmour.lan \
--to=maxime@cerno.tech \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=icenowy@aosc.io \
--cc=jagan@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=linux-amarula@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=michael@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox