From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEEEEC432C0 for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 23:00:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A902F2068E for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 23:00:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="aeNLk3CB" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726876AbfKZXAr (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:00:47 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:34658 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726200AbfKZXAr (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:00:47 -0500 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300EC2F0EC2003034EE13CF148829.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f0e:c200:3034:ee13:cf14:8829]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id B43E41EC0CD6; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:00:45 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1574809245; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=1BYd4g36wutwSqaxdQDSylrN82e2jnf8ZMNCZbx52og=; b=aeNLk3CB/v6VzkrA7gp4A8BhxOarAfd/N5P+2xMpTdJG0bD1GG5CJoXkXe/m+6TiAAD/S8 VxTdSa4SFDAGuQxEzoJADmLnfzJIvYXgM2RhVDzNkikswRVurhd0Wvwx2SO2c0tCvya+Hm /AmTaZaF0F8XIlurQ58wzjXo7ASlswU= Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:00:38 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Barret Rhoden , austin@google.com, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Rik van Riel , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: AVX register corruption from signal delivery Message-ID: <20191126230038.GI31379@zn.tnic> References: <20191126221328.GH31379@zn.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 02:30:10PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > If we do this, we should have selftests/x86/slow or otherwise have a > fast vs slow mode. I really like that the entire suite takes under 2s. Sure, we can stick it under a separate Makefile target called "full" or so to mean, run the full set of tests. We can run the fast ones first and the slow ones then. Or something to that effect. Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette