From: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com>
To: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, richard@nod.at,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/7] fs: ubifs: Eliminate timespec64_trunc() usage
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 21:30:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191130053030.7868-6-deepa.kernel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191130053030.7868-1-deepa.kernel@gmail.com>
DEFAULT_TIME_GRAN is seconds granularity. We can
just drop the nsec while creating the default root node.
Delete the unneeded call to timespec64_trunc().
Also update the ktime_get_* api to match the one used in
current_time(). This allows for the timestamps to be updated
by using the same ktime_get_* api always.
Signed-off-by: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: richard@nod.at
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
---
fs/ubifs/sb.c | 11 ++++-------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ubifs/sb.c b/fs/ubifs/sb.c
index 2b7c04bf8983..93d550be4c11 100644
--- a/fs/ubifs/sb.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/sb.c
@@ -84,7 +84,6 @@ static int create_default_filesystem(struct ubifs_info *c)
int idx_node_size;
long long tmp64, main_bytes;
__le64 tmp_le64;
- __le32 tmp_le32;
struct timespec64 ts;
u8 hash[UBIFS_HASH_ARR_SZ];
u8 hash_lpt[UBIFS_HASH_ARR_SZ];
@@ -291,16 +290,14 @@ static int create_default_filesystem(struct ubifs_info *c)
ino->creat_sqnum = cpu_to_le64(++c->max_sqnum);
ino->nlink = cpu_to_le32(2);
- ktime_get_real_ts64(&ts);
- ts = timespec64_trunc(ts, DEFAULT_TIME_GRAN);
+ ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64(&ts);
tmp_le64 = cpu_to_le64(ts.tv_sec);
ino->atime_sec = tmp_le64;
ino->ctime_sec = tmp_le64;
ino->mtime_sec = tmp_le64;
- tmp_le32 = cpu_to_le32(ts.tv_nsec);
- ino->atime_nsec = tmp_le32;
- ino->ctime_nsec = tmp_le32;
- ino->mtime_nsec = tmp_le32;
+ ino->atime_nsec = 0;
+ ino->ctime_nsec = 0;
+ ino->mtime_nsec = 0;
ino->mode = cpu_to_le32(S_IFDIR | S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR | S_IXUGO);
ino->size = cpu_to_le64(UBIFS_INO_NODE_SZ);
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-30 5:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-30 5:30 [PATCH 0/7] Delete timespec64_trunc() Deepa Dinamani
2019-11-30 5:30 ` [PATCH 1/7] fs: fat: Eliminate timespec64_trunc() usage Deepa Dinamani
2019-11-30 5:30 ` [PATCH 2/7] fs: cifs: Fix atime update check vs mtime Deepa Dinamani
2019-12-01 18:23 ` Steve French
2019-11-30 5:30 ` [PATCH 3/7] fs: cifs: Delete usage of timespec64_trunc Deepa Dinamani
2019-11-30 21:25 ` Steve French
2019-12-01 5:35 ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-11-30 5:30 ` [PATCH 4/7] fs: ceph: Delete timespec64_trunc() usage Deepa Dinamani
2019-11-30 5:30 ` Deepa Dinamani [this message]
2019-11-30 5:30 ` [PATCH 6/7] fs: Delete timespec64_trunc() Deepa Dinamani
2019-11-30 5:30 ` [PATCH 7/7] fs: Do not overload update_time Deepa Dinamani
2019-12-01 20:51 ` Dave Chinner
2019-12-02 17:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-12-02 23:13 ` Deepa Dinamani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191130053030.7868-6-deepa.kernel@gmail.com \
--to=deepa.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).