From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>,
paulmck@kernel.org, "Naveen N . Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] kprobes: Lock rcu_read_lock() while searching kprobe
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 15:02:10 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191203150210.7210c6e29c537c8954889c5b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191202233531.GO17234@google.com>
On Mon, 2 Dec 2019 18:35:31 -0500
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 07:34:53AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > Hi Joel,
> >
> > On Mon, 2 Dec 2019 16:08:54 -0500
> > Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 04:32:13PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > > > Anders reported that the lockdep warns that suspicious
> > > > RCU list usage in register_kprobe() (detected by
> > > > CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST.) This is because get_kprobe()
> > > > access kprobe_table[] by hlist_for_each_entry_rcu()
> > > > without rcu_read_lock.
> > > >
> > > > If we call get_kprobe() from the breakpoint handler context,
> > > > it is run with preempt disabled, so this is not a problem.
> > > > But in other cases, instead of rcu_read_lock(), we locks
> > > > kprobe_mutex so that the kprobe_table[] is not updated.
> > > > So, current code is safe, but still not good from the view
> > > > point of RCU.
> > > >
> > > > Let's lock the rcu_read_lock() around get_kprobe() and
> > > > ensure kprobe_mutex is locked at those points.
> > > >
> > > > Note that we can safely unlock rcu_read_lock() soon after
> > > > accessing the list, because we are sure the found kprobe has
> > > > never gone before unlocking kprobe_mutex. Unless locking
> > > > kprobe_mutex, caller must hold rcu_read_lock() until it
> > > > finished operations on that kprobe.
> > > >
> > > > Reported-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> > >
> > > Instead of this, can you not just pass the lockdep_is_held() expression as
> > > the last argument to list_for_each_entry_rcu() to silence the warning? Then
> > > it will be a simpler patch.
> >
> > Ah, I see. That is more natural to silence the warning.
>
> Np, and on such fix, my:
>
> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
>
Thanks! I found another similar issue while testing, I'll fix it too.
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-03 6:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-02 7:32 [PATCH -tip] kprobes: Lock rcu_read_lock() while searching kprobe Masami Hiramatsu
2019-12-02 15:17 ` Anders Roxell
2019-12-02 21:08 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-12-02 22:34 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-12-02 23:35 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-12-03 6:02 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2019-12-03 7:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-12-03 17:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-12-04 10:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-12-04 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-12-05 4:19 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-12-06 1:11 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-12-06 3:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-12-08 0:08 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-12-09 3:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-12-17 14:59 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-12-17 18:07 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-12-04 4:09 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-12-04 4:20 ` Joel Fernandes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191203150210.7210c6e29c537c8954889c5b@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=anders.roxell@linaro.org \
--cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox