From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Optimize select_idle_core
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 23:21:53 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191205175153.GA14172@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfTPtBH9ff=efTeJbM4UdzrHCXZs7wwn=pdE4As8pB859e++Q@mail.gmail.com>
* Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> [2019-12-05 18:27:51]:
> Hi Srikar,
>
> On Thu, 5 Dec 2019 at 18:23, Srikar Dronamraju
> <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > Currently we loop through all threads of a core to evaluate if the core
> > is idle or not. This is unnecessary. If a thread of a core is not
> > idle, skip evaluating other threads of a core.
>
> I think that the goal is also to clear all CPUs of the core from the
> cpumask of the loop above so it will not try the same core next time
>
> >
That goal we still continue to maintain by the way of cpumask_andnot.
i.e instead of clearing CPUs one at a time, we clear all the CPUs in the
core at one shot.
> > Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/sched/fair.c | 6 ++++--
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > index 69a81a5709ff..b9d628128cfc 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > @@ -5872,10 +5872,12 @@ static int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int
> > bool idle = true;
> >
> > for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_smt_mask(core)) {
> > - __cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, cpus);
> > - if (!available_idle_cpu(cpu))
> > + if (!available_idle_cpu(cpu)) {
> > idle = false;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > }
> > + cpumask_andnot(cpus, cpus, cpu_smt_mask(core));
> >
> > if (idle)
> > return core;
> > --
> > 2.18.1
> >
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-05 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-05 17:23 [PATCH] sched/fair: Optimize select_idle_core Srikar Dronamraju
2019-12-05 17:27 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-12-05 17:51 ` Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
2019-12-05 18:52 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-12-06 8:16 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2019-12-06 13:27 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-12-06 13:39 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2019-12-06 16:48 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-12-06 12:00 ` Valentin Schneider
2019-12-06 12:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-12-06 12:53 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2019-12-06 16:57 ` Valentin Schneider
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191205175153.GA14172@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox