From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Sargun Dhillon <sargun@sargun.me>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, tycho@tycho.ws, jannh@google.com,
cyphar@cyphar.com, christian.brauner@ubuntu.com,
luto@amacapital.net, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] vfs, fdtable: Add get_task_file helper
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 16:52:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191209155242.GC5388@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191209070609.GA32438@ircssh-2.c.rugged-nimbus-611.internal>
On 12/09, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
>
> +struct file *get_task_file(struct task_struct *task, unsigned int fd)
> +{
> + struct file *file = NULL;
> +
> + task_lock(task);
> + rcu_read_lock();
> +
> + if (task->files) {
> + file = fcheck_files(task->files, fd);
> + if (file && !get_file_rcu(file))
> + file = NULL;
> + }
On second thought this is not exactly right, get_file_rcu() can fail if
get_task_file() races with dup2(), in this case we need to do fcheck_files()
again. And this is what __fget() already does, so may be the patch below
makes more sense?
I will leave this to other reviewers, but suddenly I recall that I have
already sent the patch which adds a similar helper a while ago.
See https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180915160423.GA31461@redhat.com/
In short, get_files_struct() should be avoided because it can race with
exec() and break POSIX locks which use ->fl_owner = files_struct.
Oleg.
--- x/fs/file.c
+++ x/fs/file.c
@@ -706,9 +706,9 @@ void do_close_on_exec(struct files_struc
spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
}
-static struct file *__fget(unsigned int fd, fmode_t mask, unsigned int refs)
+static struct file *__fget_files(struct files_struct *files, unsigned int fd,
+ fmode_t mask, unsigned int refs)
{
- struct files_struct *files = current->files;
struct file *file;
rcu_read_lock();
@@ -729,6 +729,23 @@ loop:
return file;
}
+struct file *fget_task(struct task_struct *task, unsigned int fd)
+{
+ struct file *file;
+
+ task_lock(task);
+ if (task->files)
+ file = __fget_files(task->files, fd, 0, 1);
+ task_unlock(task);
+
+ return file;
+}
+
+static struct file *__fget(unsigned int fd, fmode_t mask, unsigned int refs)
+{
+ return __fget_files(current->files, fd, mask, refs);
+}
+
struct file *fget_many(unsigned int fd, unsigned int refs)
{
return __fget(fd, FMODE_PATH, refs);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-09 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-09 7:06 [PATCH v2 1/4] vfs, fdtable: Add get_task_file helper Sargun Dhillon
2019-12-09 15:52 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191209155242.GC5388@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cyphar@cyphar.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=sargun@sargun.me \
--cc=tycho@tycho.ws \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox