From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55874C43603 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 13:33:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2773E2077B for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 13:33:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="1n+vVP4Z" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727486AbfLJNds (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Dec 2019 08:33:48 -0500 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:44736 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727007AbfLJNdr (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Dec 2019 08:33:47 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=XtjevayN4uCPE9VpLwJtgSoB2OMml81bphwofgYd/Do=; b=1n+vVP4ZobANSv9CF92JSs0Vzp OLZ9QOqeqWVLZult6N1sSsBFnTsRiRwXXTJA24x60RGIIcV1paymZTpqyIgdC2F3NMdgJusE4N8LM p3J7m0Bi+ZjfyPKHo6MCtt61eukGbU5dd43A46peB5p/nJfKQO3BY4/r01xlhPQZJhAs=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.92.2) (envelope-from ) id 1iefdu-0004I5-Rx; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 14:33:34 +0100 Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 14:33:34 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn To: Milind Parab Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux admin , "nicolas.nerre@microchip.com" , "antoine.tenart@bootlin.com" , "f.fainelli@gmail.com" , "davem@davemloft.net" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "hkallweit1@gmail.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Dhananjay Vilasrao Kangude , "a.fatoum@pengutronix.de" , "brad.mouring@ni.com" , Parshuram Raju Thombare Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: macb: add support for high speed interface Message-ID: <20191210133334.GA16369@lunn.ch> References: <1575890033-23846-1-git-send-email-mparab@cadence.com> <1575890176-25630-1-git-send-email-mparab@cadence.com> <20191209113606.GF25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > >How has this been tested? > > > > This patch is tested in 10G fixed mode on SFP+ module. > > In our own lab, we have various hardware test platforms supporting SGMII (through a TI PHY and another build that connects to a Marvell 1G PHY), GMII (through a Marvell PHY), 10GBASE-R (direct connection to SFP+), USXGMII (currently we can emulate this using an SFP+ connection from/to our own hardware) Are any of these PHY using C45? Thanks Andrew