From: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [pipe] 3c0edea9b2: lmbench3.PIPE.bandwidth.MB/sec -17.0% regression
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 22:15:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191210141502.GQ32275@shao2-debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=whF0mbvWC=sYKWTrpymmjWkGZcX9hnHgnm1t1M++W66zA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 10:35:35AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 12:56 AM Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Huh. How can something like that can even can get merged? No changelog,
> > no s-o-b?
>
> Yeah, I missed that when pulling.
>
> I wish that had been the only problem we had with that code, but it wasn't.
>
> Anyway, I'm fairly certain the current git head should fix this
> lmbench3 performance regression too.
>
> Linus
Hi Linus,
Sorry for the inconvenience, indeed, the regression has been fixed.
commit:
cefa80ced5 ("pipe: Increase the writer-wakeup threshold to reduce context-switch count")
3c0edea9b2 ("pipe: Remove sync on wake_ups")
6794862a16 ("Merge tag 'for-5.5-rc1-kconfig-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux")
cefa80ced57a2917 3c0edea9b29f9be6c093f236f7 6794862a16ef41f753abd75c03 testcase/testparams/testbox
---------------- -------------------------- -------------------------- ---------------------------
%stddev change %stddev change %stddev
\ | \ | \
21204 -17% 17604 23% 26123 ± 3% lmbench3/performance-development-100%-PIPE-50%-ucode=0x7000019/lkp-bdw-de1
21204 -17% 17604 23% 26123 GEO-MEAN lmbench3.PIPE.bandwidth.MB/sec
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-10 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-08 15:39 [pipe] 3c0edea9b2: lmbench3.PIPE.bandwidth.MB/sec -17.0% regression kernel test robot
2019-12-09 8:55 ` Michal Hocko
2019-12-09 18:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-10 14:15 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2019-12-10 17:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-11 14:52 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191210141502.GQ32275@shao2-debian \
--to=rong.a.chen@intel.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox