From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
jiangshanlai@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: Workqueues splat due to ending up on wrong CPU
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 14:56:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191210225645.GW2889@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191210090839.GJ2844@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 10:08:39AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 10:59:08AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > And it survived! ;-)
> >
> > Peter, could I please have your Signed-off-by? Or take my Tested-by if
> > you would prefer to send it up some other way.
>
> How's this?
Very good, thank you! I have queued it on -rcu, but please let me
know if you would rather that it go in via some other path.
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> Subject: cpu/hotplug, stop_machine: Fix stop_machine vs hotplug order
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Date: Tue Dec 10 09:34:54 CET 2019
>
> Paul reported a very sporadic, rcutorture induced, workqueue failure.
> When the planets align, the workqueue rescuer's self-migrate fails and
> then triggers a WARN for running a work on the wrong CPU.
>
> Tejun then figured that set_cpus_allowed_ptr()'s stop_one_cpu() call
> could be ignored! When stopper->enabled is false, stop_machine will
> insta complete the work, without actually doing the work. Worse, it
> will not WARN about this (we really should fix this).
>
> It turns out there is a small window where a freshly online'ed CPU is
> marked 'online' but doesn't yet have the stopper task running:
>
> BP AP
>
> bringup_cpu()
> __cpu_up(cpu, idle) --> start_secondary()
> ...
> cpu_startup_entry()
> bringup_wait_for_ap()
> wait_for_ap_thread() <-- cpuhp_online_idle()
> while (1)
> do_idle()
>
> ... available to run kthreads ...
>
> stop_machine_unpark()
> stopper->enable = true;
>
> Close this by moving the stop_machine_unpark() into
> cpuhp_online_idle(), such that the stopper thread is ready before we
> start the idle loop and schedule.
>
> Reported-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
> Debugged-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> ---
> --- a/kernel/cpu.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpu.c
> @@ -525,8 +525,7 @@ static int bringup_wait_for_ap(unsigned
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE((!cpu_online(cpu))))
> return -ECANCELED;
>
> - /* Unpark the stopper thread and the hotplug thread of the target cpu */
> - stop_machine_unpark(cpu);
> + /* Unpark the hotplug thread of the target cpu */
> kthread_unpark(st->thread);
>
> /*
> @@ -1089,8 +1088,8 @@ void notify_cpu_starting(unsigned int cp
>
> /*
> * Called from the idle task. Wake up the controlling task which brings the
> - * stopper and the hotplug thread of the upcoming CPU up and then delegates
> - * the rest of the online bringup to the hotplug thread.
> + * hotplug thread of the upcoming CPU up and then delegates the rest of the
> + * online bringup to the hotplug thread.
> */
> void cpuhp_online_idle(enum cpuhp_state state)
> {
> @@ -1100,6 +1099,12 @@ void cpuhp_online_idle(enum cpuhp_state
> if (state != CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_IDLE)
> return;
>
> + /*
> + * Unpart the stopper thread before we start the idle loop (and start
> + * scheduling); this ensures the stopper task is always available.
> + */
> + stop_machine_unpark(smp_processor_id());
> +
> st->state = CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_IDLE;
> complete_ap_thread(st, true);
> }
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-10 22:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-25 23:03 Workqueues splat due to ending up on wrong CPU Paul E. McKenney
2019-11-26 18:33 ` Tejun Heo
2019-11-26 22:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-11-27 15:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-11-28 16:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-11-29 15:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-12-02 1:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-12-02 20:13 ` Tejun Heo
2019-12-02 23:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-12-03 10:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-12-03 17:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-12-03 18:13 ` Tejun Heo
2019-12-03 9:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-12-03 10:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-12-03 15:42 ` Tejun Heo
2019-12-03 16:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-12-04 20:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-12-05 10:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-12-05 10:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-12-05 14:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-12-06 3:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-12-06 18:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-12-06 22:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-12-09 18:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-12-10 9:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-12-10 22:56 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191210225645.GW2889@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72 \
--to=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox