From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] smp: Allow smp_call_function_single_async() to insert locked csd
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 10:51:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191217095156.GZ2844@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191216205833.GB161272@xz-x1>
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 03:58:33PM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 09:37:05PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 11:29:25AM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:
> > > (3) Others:
> > >
> > > *** arch/mips/kernel/process.c:
> > > raise_backtrace[713] smp_call_function_single_async(cpu, csd);
> >
> > per-cpu csd data, seems perfectly fine usage.
>
> I'm not sure whether I get the point, I just feel like it could still
> trigger as long as we do it super fast, before IPI handled,
> disregarding whether it's per-cpu csd or not.
No, I wasn't paying attention last night. I'm thinking this one might
maybe be in 1). It does the state check using that bitmap.
> > > *** arch/x86/kernel/cpuid.c:
> > > cpuid_read[85] err = smp_call_function_single_async(cpu, &csd);
> > > *** arch/x86/lib/msr-smp.c:
> > > rdmsr_safe_on_cpu[182] err = smp_call_function_single_async(cpu, &csd);
> >
> > These two have csd on stack and wait with a completion. seems fine.
>
> Yeh this is true, then I'm confused why they don't use the sync()
> helpers..
I suspect to be nice for virt. Both CPUID and MSR accesses can trap. but
now I'm confused, because it is mostly WRMSR that traps.
Anyway, see the commit here: 07cde313b2d2 ("x86/msr: Allow rdmsr_safe_on_cpu() to schedule")
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-17 9:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-04 20:48 [PATCH] smp: Allow smp_call_function_single_async() to insert locked csd Peter Xu
2019-12-11 15:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-12-11 16:29 ` Peter Xu
2019-12-16 20:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-12-16 20:58 ` Peter Xu
2019-12-17 9:51 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-12-17 15:31 ` Peter Xu
2019-12-17 20:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-12-17 20:48 ` Peter Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191217095156.GZ2844@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=namit@vmware.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox