public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] smp: Allow smp_call_function_single_async() to insert locked csd
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 10:51:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191217095156.GZ2844@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191216205833.GB161272@xz-x1>

On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 03:58:33PM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 09:37:05PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 11:29:25AM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:

> > > (3) Others:
> > > 
> > > *** arch/mips/kernel/process.c:
> > > raise_backtrace[713]           smp_call_function_single_async(cpu, csd);
> > 
> > per-cpu csd data, seems perfectly fine usage.
> 
> I'm not sure whether I get the point, I just feel like it could still
> trigger as long as we do it super fast, before IPI handled,
> disregarding whether it's per-cpu csd or not.

No, I wasn't paying attention last night. I'm thinking this one might
maybe be in 1). It does the state check using that bitmap.

> > > *** arch/x86/kernel/cpuid.c:
> > > cpuid_read[85]                 err = smp_call_function_single_async(cpu, &csd);
> > > *** arch/x86/lib/msr-smp.c:
> > > rdmsr_safe_on_cpu[182]         err = smp_call_function_single_async(cpu, &csd);
> > 
> > These two have csd on stack and wait with a completion. seems fine.
> 
> Yeh this is true, then I'm confused why they don't use the sync()
> helpers..

I suspect to be nice for virt. Both CPUID and MSR accesses can trap. but
now I'm confused, because it is mostly WRMSR that traps.

Anyway, see the commit here: 07cde313b2d2 ("x86/msr: Allow rdmsr_safe_on_cpu() to schedule")

  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-17  9:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-04 20:48 [PATCH] smp: Allow smp_call_function_single_async() to insert locked csd Peter Xu
2019-12-11 15:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-12-11 16:29   ` Peter Xu
2019-12-16 20:37     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-12-16 20:58       ` Peter Xu
2019-12-17  9:51         ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-12-17 15:31           ` Peter Xu
2019-12-17 20:23             ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-12-17 20:48               ` Peter Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191217095156.GZ2844@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=namit@vmware.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox