From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>, Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: clarify the difference between obj-y and obj-m w.r.t. descending
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 17:49:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191219164915.GS22665@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191219115100.958-1-masahiroy@kernel.org>
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 08:51:00PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Kbuild descends into a directory by either 'y' or 'm', but there is an
> important difference.
>
> Kbuild combines the built-in objects into built-in.a in each directory.
> The built-in.a in the directory visited by obj-y is merged into the
> built-in.a in the parent directory. This merge happens recursively when
> Kbuild is ascending back towards the top directory, so built-in objects
> are linked into vmlinux eventually. This works properly only when the
> Makefile that specifies obj-y is reachable by the chain of obj-y.
>
> On the other hand, Kbuild does not take built-in.a from the directory
> visited by obj-m. This it, all the objects in that directory are supposed
> to be modular. If Kbuild descends into a directory by obj-m, but the
> Makefile in the sub-directory specifies obj-y, those objects are just
> left orphan.
>
> The current statement "Kbuild only uses this information to decide that
> it needs to visit the directory" is misleading. Clarify the difference.
>
> Reported-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Looks good! Thanks for fixing this.
Reviewed-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
> ---
>
> Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.rst | 16 +++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.rst b/Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.rst
> index b9b50553bfc5..d7e6534a8505 100644
> --- a/Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.rst
> @@ -297,9 +297,19 @@ more details, with real examples.
> If CONFIG_EXT2_FS is set to either 'y' (built-in) or 'm' (modular)
> the corresponding obj- variable will be set, and kbuild will descend
> down in the ext2 directory.
> - Kbuild only uses this information to decide that it needs to visit
> - the directory, it is the Makefile in the subdirectory that
> - specifies what is modular and what is built-in.
> +
> + Kbuild uses this information not only to decide that it needs to visit
> + the directory, but also to decide whether or not to link objects from
> + the directory into vmlinux.
> +
> + When Kbuild descends into the directory with 'y', all built-in objects
> + from that directory are combined into the built-in.a, which will be
> + eventually linked into vmlinux.
> +
> + When Kbuild descends into the directory with 'm', in contrast, nothing
> + from that directory will be linked into vmlinux. If the Makefile in
> + that directory specifies obj-y, those objects will be left orphan.
> + It is very likely a bug of the Makefile or of dependencies in Kconfig.
>
> It is good practice to use a `CONFIG_` variable when assigning directory
> names. This allows kbuild to totally skip the directory if the
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-19 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-19 11:51 [PATCH] kbuild: clarify the difference between obj-y and obj-m w.r.t. descending Masahiro Yamada
2019-12-19 16:49 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2019-12-21 15:32 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-12-19 19:53 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-12-20 16:00 ` Masahiro Yamada
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191219164915.GS22665@localhost \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox