From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru>,
Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"juri.lelli@redhat.com" <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
"vincent.guittot@linaro.org" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
"dietmar.eggemann@arm.com" <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
"bsegall@google.com" <bsegall@google.com>,
"mgorman@suse.de" <mgorman@suse.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] sched: Micro optimization in pick_next_task() and in check_preempt_curr()
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:44:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191219214559.014320534@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20191219214451.340746474@goodmis.org
From: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru>
This introduces an optimization based on xxx_sched_class addresses
in two hot scheduler functions: pick_next_task() and check_preempt_curr().
It is possible to compare pointers to sched classes to check, which
of them has a higher priority, instead of current iterations using
for_each_class().
One more result of the patch is that size of object file becomes a little
less (excluding added BUG_ON(), which goes in __init section):
$size kernel/sched/core.o
text data bss dec hex filename
before: 66446 18957 676 86079 1503f kernel/sched/core.o
after: 66398 18957 676 86031 1500f kernel/sched/core.o
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/711a9c4b-ff32-1136-b848-17c622d548f3@yandex.ru
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 24 +++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 90e4b00ace89..63401807fcf0 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1416,20 +1416,10 @@ static inline void check_class_changed(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
void check_preempt_curr(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
{
- const struct sched_class *class;
-
- if (p->sched_class == rq->curr->sched_class) {
+ if (p->sched_class == rq->curr->sched_class)
rq->curr->sched_class->check_preempt_curr(rq, p, flags);
- } else {
- for_each_class(class) {
- if (class == rq->curr->sched_class)
- break;
- if (class == p->sched_class) {
- resched_curr(rq);
- break;
- }
- }
- }
+ else if (p->sched_class > rq->curr->sched_class)
+ resched_curr(rq);
/*
* A queue event has occurred, and we're going to schedule. In
@@ -3914,8 +3904,7 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
* higher scheduling class, because otherwise those loose the
* opportunity to pull in more work from other CPUs.
*/
- if (likely((prev->sched_class == &idle_sched_class ||
- prev->sched_class == &fair_sched_class) &&
+ if (likely(prev->sched_class <= &fair_sched_class &&
rq->nr_running == rq->cfs.h_nr_running)) {
p = pick_next_task_fair(rq, prev, rf);
@@ -6569,6 +6558,11 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
unsigned long ptr = 0;
int i;
+ BUG_ON(&idle_sched_class > &fair_sched_class ||
+ &fair_sched_class > &rt_sched_class ||
+ &rt_sched_class > &dl_sched_class ||
+ &dl_sched_class > &stop_sched_class);
+
wait_bit_init();
#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
--
2.24.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-19 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-19 21:44 [RFC][PATCH 0/4] sched: Optimizations to sched_class processing Steven Rostedt
2019-12-19 21:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/4] sched: Force the address order of each sched class descriptor Steven Rostedt
2019-12-20 8:52 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-12-20 10:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-12-20 10:12 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-12-20 10:44 ` Kirill Tkhai
2019-12-20 15:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-12-20 12:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-12-20 14:34 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-12-19 21:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/4] sched: Have sched_class_highest define by vmlinux.lds.h Steven Rostedt
2019-12-20 8:52 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2020-06-25 11:53 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Steven Rostedt (VMware)
2019-12-19 21:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/4] sched: Remove struct sched_class next field Steven Rostedt
2019-12-20 12:14 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2020-06-25 11:53 ` [tip: sched/core] sched: Remove struct sched_class::next field tip-bot2 for Steven Rostedt (VMware)
2019-12-19 21:44 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191219214559.014320534@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tkhai@yandex.ru \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox